Could the 9/11 attackers have had accomplices inside the towers?

Question

I'm no conspiracy theory fan, and I am sure the planes did the damage and al-Qaida was behind it.
But - I remember one of the survivors saying that as they were evacuating, a man with a bullhorn was on one of the landings telling everyone the damage had been contained and they should all go back to their offices.
Could he have been part of the plot, to maximise casualties? As the operation was a suicide one, he wouldn't have minded going down with the towers himself.

Answer 1

I doubt it. Possible but I doubt it. What more damage could any in-towers accomplices he do than a massive jumbo jet full of high-octane fuel hitting the towers at hundred of miles per hour?

Theres always at least one idiot trying to play a hero and keep people calm. The people in the 2nd tower had loads of time to evacuate after hit on the first tower. Instead some clever people tried to say it was safe and told them to stay put.

Answer 2

Interestingly, on the tapes which were finally released of the voice recordings of the firemen in the tower, one of the firemen (up on the floors just below the main fires) was quite clearly heard to say that the situation was containable and that his team could take on the problem. Then the building mysteriously collapsed on top of everyone...

I am 100% sure that there is more to the collapse of the towers than 2 planes crashing into them. The impact of the planes didn't knock the building over straight away, so the structure should still have been sound. Aviation fuel burns, it doesn't explode, and it certainly doesn't burn hot enough or long enough to destroy a buildings integrity, and even then, why would all the floors below blow out at the same time? Unless there was a massive issue with the structures of the buildings.

Finally, try the links below...

Answer 3

no one desires to have faith it substitute into all an 'interior activity': this is in simple terms too terrible to think approximately.. in spite of the undeniable fact that, after reviewing the information, some issues stay that propose some government dishonesty, the main salient being the destruction of making 7. the alternative to 'pull' WTC 7 substitute into admitted to via Larry Silverstein. This actuality has led a super style of people to the very unpalatable end that the completed 9/11 catastrophe substitute right into a pretend flag operation. it might desire to take a sparkling administration to get to the backside 9/11.

Answer 4

I think that it is highly unlikely that the terrorists would have thought about placing accomplices in the building. I believe that they directed all of their efforts at getting those two airplanes to hit the towers. Considering the extremely challenging nature of what they were attempting to accomplish, the spectacular damage to the buildings and the horrible loss of life that would inevitably have occurred if their plot were to succeed, I can't imagine that they would have given any thought to trying to deceive people into staying in the towers after they were hit.

Answer 5

It's a very interesting question or point of view. My first impulse what to say "What for ? To be sure the towers remain in their places ?" but then of course, terrorists are ready to sacrify their own lifes, and they want as many casualties as possible so ...
However, it is possible that the man was just under shock, as we all would be in such a circumstance, are we not ?
So it's an open issue. I starred the question for that.

Answer 6

hi,im no conspiracy theorist myself but i have watched a few documentaries on this subject and have heard so many highly qualified engineers opinions from tv that there were explosions like bombs going off inside the building.alot of these guys say that it was a controlled demolition aswell which is strange because when i seen it happen on tv it looked like it was a controlled demolition job.lets face it ,it was obviously a well thought out attack so there is no reason to say bombs could'nt have been planted ready for the attack.

Answer 7

I remember that, he made many people that were almost to the door go back upstairs to their floor. So I say to that anything is possible. This man you are talking about was right at the downstairs front door. How well I remember that. Wow, I can see you have been thinking a lot about this. Good for you. It is good to be that observant, because I saw it but never gave it a second thought. Thanks

Answer 8

there's always the possibility.

But think of it this way- in a catastrophy, no one would have known what exactly to do. information and directions were unclear and had no existing procedures to be based upon.

Take a look at the tapes too, and you might see that the sequence of the attack at made it seem that at times, it was safe to return to the buildings.

just my two cents worth.

Answer 9

I seriously doubt it ,even if they had accomplices in the office and those guys were shouting in bullhorns ,no one would have heeded them at a time of so much fear and confusion,the first impulse would have to been to get to safety

Answer 10

Yes. There were a couple of guys with those red paddle things guiding the planes in.