English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Before Bush told them to "Bring it on?"

Before BushCo. fabricated and manipulated intelligence, and used 9/11 to invade Iraq for no legitimate reason (even one of his neocon puppetmasters, Richard Perle, an architect of the plan since 1998 to invade Iraq, has said the war was illegal, but to him it was worth it, to protect Israel, I guess, he is a dual Israeli citizen).

Afghanistan and Iraq invasions were planned before 9/11. 9/11 was a staged event.

Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians killed, over 5k American soldiers killed, countless more on both sides maimed for life, and refugees created.

Billions wasted, America's finances a mess, and the shills and pundits on Fox are still selling this, and the Democrats put impeachment off the table last election (support for Bush impeachment far greater than it was for Clinton)
http://www.democrats.com/bush-impeachment-poll-2

Act locally, support impeachment movements and proceedings at the municipal and state level.

2007-04-14 17:29:44 · 7 answers · asked by dontknow772002 3 in News & Events Current Events

7 answers

Notice these answers do not address your claim that the Bush administration administration orchestrated the 9/11 attacks.

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/index.html

In terms of "outrageous conspiracy theories," the official story behind 911 is the most outrageous of them all.
http://www.pdeastbay.org/911MythReality/

Motive, means and opportunity - the pro Iraq invasion PNAC organization, which includes Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Perle whom you mention, called for a "catastrophic and catalyzing event - a 'New Pearl Harbor', in order to speed up support for their radical military agenda, in their document 'Rebuilding America's Defenses,' published in September 2000, almost exactly one year before 911. This same group had urged Clinton to invade Iraq in a letter to Clinton in 1998. Both documents can be seen on the group's website http://www.newamericancentury.org

By the way, George Bush's brother was responsible for security for the World Trade Center up until 911 (means and opportunity), and there were many reports of strange happenings in the buildings in the weeks leading up to the implosions of the buildings (the plane crashes were a spectacular diversion, which blinded many to the fact that those buildings were exploded from within - the video evidence itself is obvious, and supported by numerous eye witness accounts).

The facts surrounding the Pentagon 'attack' and the WTC building collapses support this theory much more than the support the 'official' version. Actually many facts refute the official explanation, and point to an inside job, a cover-up, and a massive propaganda campaign since then to support wars which were, as you say, pre-planned long before 9/11, to support infringement on civil rights and liberties, and to basicaly sell fear to the citizenry for the profit of big oil, and defense contracting conglomerates, among others, while needed social services at home are gutted.

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/index.html

And what of Afghanistan? What do the few remaining supporters of the Iraq war have to say about that? It's because of 911? Bush invaded both countries, refusing negotiations with both, according to pre-existing plans that he and others in his administration, Cheney, Rumsfeld et al would not waiver from, and it is clear the so-called "evidence" was falsified - this along with the illegal wire-tapping of citizens, not to mention the pre-meditated mass-murder of Americans on 911 is grounds for imprisonment, let alone impeachment.

Impeachment could indeed a first step, but it would be urgent, as there are less than 2 years remaining in Bush's term. I found this link; some may not like the source, but Michael Moore has posted links of which may be of interest.


Be It Resolved: You Can Impeach the President
Official State Impeachment Text
Impeachment Text for Cities & Towns
Impeachment Text for County Democratic Committees
Impeachment Text for State Assemblies and/or Legislatures
Jefferson's Manual, Section LIII, 603
You Can Impeach the President
http://www.michaelmoore.com/mustread/index.php?id=622

2007-04-14 18:26:25 · answer #1 · answered by serge 2 · 2 3

Actually, there have numerous reasons to invade Iraq before (though I don't particularly support the war) including the facts that Hussein attempted to assassinate former Pres. George H.W. Bush (an assasination or attempted assasination of a president is reason enough in itself to declare war) and that Husseins gassed thousands of his own citizens. Don't go judging a situation based on you conceptions. Not to offend you, but what makes you think that your judgements are all perfectly correct? I don't particularly support the war (as I said) or Bush, but you sound like you personally know all of the details of everything to do with the war, which you probably don't.....sorry if you are offended by my views, but I think you may be overexaggeting some things while not taking into account the whole picture...

2007-04-14 17:43:08 · answer #2 · answered by Morgs L 4 · 3 1

You've forgotten. The US invaded Iraq because it was, at the time, a classic terrorist state. The Saddam government terrorized the Iraqi population and supported various terrorist groups in other countries, both Sunni and Shia.

2007-04-14 17:38:42 · answer #3 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 3 0

TERRORIST HAVE ALWAYS EXISTED, IT IS JUST THAT IT HIT HOME ON 9/11. LET US NOT FORGET THIS WAS NOT THE FIRST TIME THE THE TWC HAD BEEN BOMBED BY TERRORIST. BACK IN THE 90'S, A SHEIK SOMETHING OR OTHER WHO IS BLIND AND STILL IN JAIL WAS RESPONSIBLE, THIS IS NEW TO US, BUT VERY OLD NEWS TO IRAQ, YOU ALSO FORGET THE HI-JACKING OF AIRPLANES IN BEIRUT, AND THE HOSTAGES THAT WERE HELD WHEN CARTER WAS THE PRESIDENT, GOOGLE IT ( TERRORIST) THE WORD MEANS TO ATTAIN BY FORCE: PLANNED, ORGANIZED, AND HOSTILE ACTIONS. I AM AN AMERICAN, I WILL NOT SUPPORT IMPEACHING A PRESIDENT, I FEEL IT IS VERY UNAMERICAN TO SAY THESE THINGS, IT ONLY GIVE THE TERRORIST AND THEIR SYMPHATHIZER, VALIDATION TO CONTIUE. YOU DO REALIZE THAT OTHER COUNTRIES HATE US, THEY ARE WATCHING THE WAY SOME OF YOU TEAR APART OUR PRESIDENT, CALLING HIM NAMES. YOU DO REALIZE ALSO THAT THE COUNTRIES WATCHING DO NOT HAVE THE SAME FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES THAT WE TAKE FOR GRANTED. YOU DO REALIZE THAT WHEN OTHER COUNTRIES SEE AND HEAR YOU SPEAK AGAINST YOUR PRESIDENT, THATTHEY HAVE LITTLE OR NO RESPECT FOR YOU AS WELL, YOU ARE VIEWED TO THEM AS WEAK AND NOT TO BE TRUSTED, FOR THOSE SAME FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES AND YES INSIDE PLUMBING, THAT YOU AND OTHERS TAKE FOR GRANTED , ARE THE VERY THINGS THAT PEOPLE DIE EVERY DAY TRYING TO GET TO IN THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY OR OTHERWISE FOR. AND REMEMBER THOSE BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN OVER THERE DOING THEIR JOBS TO KEEP US SAFE, YOU AND OTHERS LIKE YOU ARE UNDERMINING THEM AS WELL, THE QUESTION YOU SHOULD BE ASKING IS WHAT HAVE I DONE TO KEEP THIS COUNTRY SAFE, NOT SITTING BACK IN YOUR OH, SO SAFE ENVIRO., THRASHING OUR GOVERNMENT, BECAUSE GOOD, BAD, OR INDIFFERENT, THAT IS WHAT HE IS, DID YOU VOTE, HAVE YOU FOUGHT TO DEFEND YOUR COUNTRY, IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED NO TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS IN YOUR MIND, THEN BE QUIET AND SIT DOWN PLEASE. AND IF THERE ARE SOME OF YOU OUT THERE WHO WANT TO JUSTIFY AND SAY YOU DON'T BELEIVE IN WAR, HERE IS A NEWS FLASH , YOU ARE IN THE WRONG COUNTRY, BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THIS COUNTRY WAS BUILT ON " LIVE FREE OR DIE" I AM FOR LIVING FREE, HOW BOUT YOU.? IT DOES NOT COME CHEAP. WHERE ARE YOUR FACTS>>???? AND YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ALSO ANOTHER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT THAT SOMEONE ELSE DIED FOR :RESPECT IT!!

2007-04-14 18:07:44 · answer #4 · answered by MS.J 1 · 3 3

I hated Saddam up to any guy, however th sensible reality is, the one connection he needed to the nine/eleven assaults is whilst he used to be dancing within the streets after it occurred. Don't get me unsuitable, he had to pass. I simply believe they must were extra forthright with that goal.

2016-09-05 13:33:05 · answer #5 · answered by gloyd 3 · 0 0

Nope . During WW ll you liberals would have said killing Nazis would make more Nazis . Your propaganda is just that . That's why liberals work so hard to get rid of talk radio and info on the Internet . You can't get too many to buy your conspiracies and anarchy anymore..and the desperation must be wearing thin ..

2007-04-14 19:10:41 · answer #6 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 2 1

And I suppose you also believe that the lunar landing was actually filmed in a Hollywood studio. Okay, so WMDs were not found, but did you ever stop to think that they were smuggled out of the country?

2007-04-14 21:40:22 · answer #7 · answered by Black Tomorrow 5 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers