In 1999, Washington-based war-mongering think-tank The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) asked their top "thinkers" (including Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Perle) to outline a Pax Americana for the new millennium. Their paper, entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses", called for a return to Cold War levels of defensive spending, expansion into space-based weaponry, and strategic repositioning of the USA in the Middle East for control of natural resources. However, the report warned that such a transformation
"... is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."
2007-04-14 17:09:23 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What really upsets me is that we have all these people coming forward with credible testimony about explosions and we have been completely ignored by the 9/11 Commission and the major media... The American press, they have locked their doors on all of us, never allowing our stories to surface or even trying to investigate why the 9/11 Commission didn't bother to include out statements in the final report... What does that tell you?
2007-04-14 17:14:07 · answer #1 · answered by jimmy 2 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Best ideaI have heard from politicains in a long while, most of the liberals think that while China and Russia have increased the defense spending to all time highs.
We should cut our GNP of our own defense.
This is foolish thinking at its worst, why is it that we think China and Russia are our freinds?
They are simply biding their time till we are vunerable, Iwould not really fear Russia as mush as Europe, they deep down hate us and it is apparent when ever we go in front of the UN security council.
What the hell does war mongering mean anyway?
I always hear the liberals throw it around when they refer to Bush, I guess Winston Churhill was a war mongerer, while Chamberlain the "peace maker" was making a deal with Hitlr
2007-04-14 17:22:51 · answer #2 · answered by Jack L. W. 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The terrorists published their plan for hatred and world domination on 9/11/01 - and numerous times prior.
How about a good source to check this "Rebuilding America's Defenses" out?
2007-04-14 17:17:38 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
LOL....
My best friend woke me up at four in the morning when he read about that (it was a couple of years ago)...I was, like, "hugn?"
Well, Cheney and his crew got their modern-day pearl harbor (9/11)...
Does Pax-Americana mean that Rosie is right?!
It's funny (awkward not humorous) how much the Patriot Act is like the (NAZI) Reichstag Fire Decree...
I don't like to be a conspiracy theorist...but is history being repeated here?
Germany was one of the most liberal countries post-WWI, then the Nazis came and it began a descent into conservative policies....
It seems just like that, here, now....
2007-04-14 17:28:23 · answer #4 · answered by Julian X 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The most likely reason is that this paper was to be circulated among their peers (and fellow neocons), and they could rest assured in the knowledge that most people don't read very much, and certainly don't do the research they should on matters such as this.
2007-04-14 17:23:13 · answer #5 · answered by AlanC 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your question is a lie. You want to know why the "neocons" published a plan for world domination and they did not do that . Their plan was to bolster America's defense. You are either a weak reader or an out and out liar. Which one are you?
2007-04-14 17:18:07 · answer #6 · answered by just the facts 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I find it hard to fantham that there are people like you out there. All those liberal, conspiracy freaks, I'm sure I work with a whole bunch of you, it would explain a lot! Were you born this way, did something tramatic happen along the way?
2007-04-14 17:18:32 · answer #7 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i have placed them om "carry" have you ever see how , those days that a number of the Worlds should be DICK-TATORS have come to a sticky end ? Saddam Hussein:-Hanged ....Gaddaffi:-Shot by technique of his personal human beings .... :- Osama Bin (sillybugger) encumbered:- Shot by technique of US Marines. i do not want that taking position to me.
2016-12-04 01:27:25 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your statement that such a document was published (in 2000) is true, of course, but what's your question?
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And please come up with a less offensive ID.
2007-04-14 17:17:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because they honestly believe in their efforts!
They are deluded and powerful and evil and yet still need to have support in their efforts!
2007-04-14 17:15:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋