do not open the taboo --- a lot of folks in here love to live in denial
2007-04-14 14:48:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
the first thought that came to my mind upon reading this post was 1. WHY is college tuition fee is America ridiculously expensive? WHY do colleges need so much money? A college is NOT a company like Apple or Microsoft. My sister will graduate from her 4 years of university soon and the total coast of tuition pee paid during those 4 years....is OMG too much. the amount is almost as much as the U.S. national debt. 2. do colleges REALLY need a lot of money? 3. America is currently facing an economic crisis; it is predicted to be one of the worst ever in U.S. history. So unemployment is a rising issue, the economy is getting spoiled and there are more innocent citizens suffering beneath the poverty line. And i am NOT against the government but the federal government doesn't seem to be sorting it out well. I don't know that much about the ecnonomy, so I learned from my sister (she's a business / economics major) and i can tell that the nation, the economy and so on are all facing a crisis. Soo....i don't know but unless the government promises to like help the poor pay for college or something I strongly suggest that colleges DO NOT raise tuition fees. Otherwise...America will face an even worse educational crisis. Does the stuff I typed make sense? hope it does. And......the good news is that the expensive tuition fee paid to a great college was actually worth it since my sister got a great job 2 weeks before graduation.
2016-05-20 01:41:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, the "Monica" portion of the Clinton investigation was a very small part of the investigation. Ken Starr was appointed by a three judge panel to replace Friske--to continue investigation of Clinton's CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES-include Whitewater. Over the course of the investigation, fifteen individuals — including Clinton friends Jim McDougal and Susan McDougal, White House counsel Webster Hubbell and Arkansas Governor Jim Guy Tucker — were convicted of federal charges. Clinton pardoned four of them in the final hours of his presidency. You can blame Clinton entirely for the huge cost of the investigation-his perjury, suboring perjury--sending witnesses out of the country, and the 'unfortunate demise' of many witnesses delayed the production of evidence and "unmeritorious litigation" by the president's lawyers severely impeded the investigation's progress. It takes time to cover up those crimes--and the Clinton's needed A LOT of time--thus jacking up the bill to the American taxpayer.
2007-04-14 15:08:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Clinton Investigation kept moving into additional areas of investigation. And with the obligatory attempts at stonewalling, it took years. The 9/11 Commission was on a tight timeline and, while the Bush Administration did stonewall on some issues, they were able to compromise and get it done.
Did anyone ever figure out how those Rose Law firm files made their way to that table in the White House?
2007-04-14 14:50:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because the Republican congress covered up the crime of the decade.
38. Senator Bob Graham also said: "High officials in [the Saudi Arabian] government, who I assume were not just rogue officials acting on their own, made substantial contributions to the support and wellbeing of two of these terrorists and facilitated their ability to plan, practise and then execute the tragedy of September 11." These investigations remain blocked, classified, covered-up and unresolved to this day by the Bush administration's clear Obstruction of Justice.
39. Senator and 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned, saying: "This is the most serious independent investigation since the Warren Commission. And after watching History Channel shows on the Warren Commission last night, the Warren Commission blew it. I'm not going to be part of that. I'm not going to be part of looking at information only partially. I'm not going to be part of just coming to quick conclusions. I'm not going to be part of political pressure to do this or not do that. I'm not going to be part of that. This is serious."
http://kucinich.us/node/2896
2007-04-14 15:07:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by andy r 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because at the time we had about the stupidest, silliest, assssssinnninnee twerps who started this whole nonsense because they got tired of patting their thighs while discussing legislation...so they all gathered together and grinned at each other and talked bs to each other, all the while wishing they had some chick to do the same thing to them. But since they didn't, (or at least acted as if the didn't) they thrust it on on that Clinton guy. It cost a lot of money because just about EVERY darn body was interested in Clinton's personal life which if he had had an ounce of brains he would have told all of these nuts to just back off and MYOFB, if you know what I mean. But he didn't and so they all marched around like their morals were through the heavens and they just wasted their time, our time, Moniika's time and Clinton's time. And if he had had any idea that the media would have been following around that little Jewish girl - dipping their noses and cameras in ALL of her business, and if he had had any idea that some old broad was telling 'that woman' what to do, well, Clinton would have been a whole lot better off even to this day. And so money was spent, on bs really.
(ALERT ALERT. For all cheaters. For God's sake, you all have computers and if you don't you have access to them. Do yourselves a favor and "digitize" what these women you are fooling around with will look like in ten years....maybe even FIVE years. Because every single woman who has fooled around with some politician over the years looks like holy------ later on in life.))
2007-04-14 14:50:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by rare2findd 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because liberals forgot about 9/11 about 6 months after the horrific attack and to try and be fair because Republicans went on a fishing expedition to impeach Clinton, which was a joke. I am conservative, but trying to impeach Clinton for that was stupid. It was a personal matter.
2007-04-14 15:03:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Billy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's because the Clintons were continually throwing up roadblocks to the investigation like hiding the Rose Law Firm records in the White House family Residence and conveniently forgetting that they were there. Then there were the threats made against all the witnesses by Hillary's strong arm crew.
2007-04-14 15:02:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
it is mind boggling that a witch hunt into Clinton's sexual encounters is more important than finding out the truth about 9-11. This says volumes about Republicans/Conservatives.
2007-04-14 14:48:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because the prosecutor had free reign on what he could go after.
The 911 stuff was basically an assembly of already known intelligence and evidence captured from events of that day.
2007-04-14 14:50:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by dapixelator 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Another example of fiscal conservatism. All those witches brooms and boiling cauldrons were considered capital investments.
2007-04-14 14:49:57
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋