What is it about not destroying the Earth that has so many upset?

Question

When scientists of the world and US scientists are telling our government that CO2 pollution is causing damage shouldn't we consider addressing the issue and solving the problem?

Answer 1

Global Warming - Well actually the truth of Global Warming

In this piece { and yes I like calling it that , it gives it a sense of importance } you will learn how global warming started , why global warming is a myth { however the symptoms of global warming are not , not in the wildest imagination } you will also learn what are actually causing these so called symptoms , so keep reading because it will surprise you .

To understand global warming we have to go back in time { so slip in the new Clay Aiken cd , because a thousand days and a thousand nights are not enough } and off we go . Welcome to February 1972 where an article sponsored by the World Association of World Federalists appeared in a magazine titled the Humanist { the magazine of the American Humanist Association } in this article the World Association of World Federalists said and I quote -

" World Federalists believe that the environmental crisis facing planet earth is a global problem and therefore call for a global solution - a worldwide United Nations environmental agency with the power to make decisions stick . W.A.W.F. has submitted a proposal for just such an agency to be considered at the 1972 U.N. environmental conference to be held in Stockholm . "

The momentum gathered from the U.N. environmental conference and because of the power the W.A.W.F. held led to { you guessed it } the United Nations Environmental program or U.N.E.P. { which officially started the global warming movement and debate } . The first executive director of U.N.E.P. was the Canadian millionaire who made his money in oil - Maurice Strong , the man who was the secretary general of the Stockholm conference . Anyway lets move on , in 1990 in a speech addressing the global forum conference , Mikhail Gorbachev said and I quote -

" The ecological crisis we are experiencing today - from ozone depletion to deforestation and disastrous air pollution is tragic , but convincing proof that the world we all live in is interrelated and interdependent . This means that we need an appropriate international policy in the field of ecology . Only if we formulate such a policy shall we be able to avert catastrophe . True , the elaboration of such a policy poses unconventional and difficult problems that will affect the sovereignty of states . "

Then in 1991 a good friend of Maurice Strong named Lester R. Brown a member of the Council on Foreign Relations { C.F.R. } , put out a report which stated and I quote -

" The battle to save the planet will replace the battle over ideology as the organizing theme of the new world order , with the end of the ideological conflict that dominated a generation of international affairs , a new world order , shaped by a new agenda , will emerge . "

Then in 1992 came the United Nations earth summit which was held in Rio De Janeiro and brought together the world governments and the best known environmentalists and who was the secretary general at this conference { yes you guessed it , gold star for you } Maurice Strong . at this very conference came a speech from the former secretary of state of the United States under Richard Nixon - Henry Kissinger - which stated and I quote -

" Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order , tomorrow they will great full . This is epically true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond , whether real of promulgated , that threatened our very existence . It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil . The one thing every man fears is the unknown . When presented with this scenario , individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government . "

I'm sure your thinking what is the point of all this , well the point is if you haven't noticed my little green bugs of displeasing , that global warming was started to control , period . That is its purpose . There is no truth what so ever to global warming , it was , is and will probably always be , used to control other countries , average peoples lives and everything in between , its that simple . It has nothing to do with particles of dust in the air . If it did then how come people can't see the Hollywood sign in California and can clearly see straight ahead in New York , the answer - because the earth is self sufficient . The politicians who constantly talk about global warming know this , that is the only reason they are pushing this , unless of course they are totally brainless and the media pushes it because they do what there told , and the celebrities who push global warming either don't know and are being manipulated or actually believe that they are doing a good thing . So now lets get down to the symptoms of global warming which you most likely won't see on the news and the U.N. , politician's , etc. has known about for years .

Hold onto your hats and strap in those seat belts because here we go - the symptoms of global warming is caused by { get ready } - the earths energy field { yes you read that right } . We are now according to a number of scientists experiencing a cycle called procession something that happens every 26,000 years where the earth will stop spinning and half the earth will be left in darkness for a number of days - just let me explain . The earth is a giant magnet with different levels rotating to create a magnetic field , however the earth is spinning faster and faster and the more powerful it spins the more dense the magnetic field . Two thousand years ago the earths rotations reached its peak according to a California scientist named Gregg Braden and has been falling ever since . The earths rotation called Base Resonant Frequency or Schumann Cavity Resonance was first identified in 1899 . Between 1899 and the mid 1990's the earth maintained a constant pulse of around 7.8 hertz or 7 cycles a second . By the end of 1995 it had increased to 8.6 last I checked it was 11 and still rising . Gregg Braden says that the earth is spinning out of control and will indeed stop , he say's this will happen he believes on December 12 , 2012 . He calls this zero point when the earths magnetic field will disappear because the planets rotation will have stopped . However before you go jump out that window my friend this does not mean we will fall off the earth as gravity is a different energy all together . The earth will spin again , however the other way around and east will become west and west will become east . This has happened in history at least 14 times in the last 4.5 million years , the last one is said to have happened in about 11 - 13,000 BC . This is essentially what is causing floods , famine , the melting of the polar icecaps , ozone depletion and terrible weather around the globe - the earths rotation or lack there of . This according to Gregg Braden and many scientists who have been told to shut up and keep quiet when they present this fact to government officials who don't want to hear it , why ? Well scroll up and read why and next time try and pay attention .

Answer 2

US government scientists are not convinced that global warming is due to humans and that it is a natural cycle of heat and cold periods. They do have some evidence to back this up, but it pales in comparison to the amount of evidence that global warming and other CO2 related problems is human caused. (also the fact that the White house and Senate do not like the idea of having to sort out a problem, that america is the worst at, may lead the scientists to have such a view).

The main reason for non-action is economic. Sorting out these problems costs a lot of money and time. And as everyone knows - time is money! The only major countries not trying to sort this out (at any substantial level anyway) is America and Australia. Both large and very low density countries, where transport is highly important. Transport is a major pollutant and would have to be reduced, therefore limiting the more isolated areas reach to transport and therefore damaging the economy.

Also, America, which produces over 25% of all the world's CO2 emmisions, has a large sector of its economy based solely on Transport (Ford and Boeing) and Oil. To cut these back, which is almost a neccessity if anything substantial is to be established, would damage the american, and therefore international, economies severly.

But one has to look at the outcomes of the two possibilities available to them at the moment. Live in riches for the moment and have your children die and suffer, or live in a slightly poorer times (nothing too dramatic), for the future of everything on the planet. The choice is ours to make.

Answer 3

We most definately should. But "we" don't carry enough influence. In other words, we don't have enough cash to influence people.

Actually doing something about the problem would cost a lot of corporations money. Corporations don't like spending money. Corporations own lobbyist which own congress to make sure corporations don't spend money on anything they don't want to. Both republican and democrat.

Basically, this is a problem where too many people/corporations will end up spending money. So despite a nearly unanimous global scientific consensus, the corporations and governments are doing their best to cast as much doubt and spin as possible on this.

This will most likely work in the short term. In fact, judging by the number of people who have drunk the koolaid (and ignored the volumes of scientifc research available for review on the subject), I'd say it has worked.

But take heart. It will only work for so long. Like those who did not listen to Noah when he said the flood was coming, a lot of people will realize too late that this is a problem we must deal with.

Global Climate Change will not destroy the planet. It will have a big impact on society as a whole though, depending on the level of action we take.

~X~

Answer 4

When scientists of the world as well as US scientists are telling me that CO2 pollution isn't a problem then WHY should I care?

Answer 5

Global Warming is happening.. however it is not just man made.. there are many factors that are affecting it.. the earth is moving closer to the sun.. so we are getting hotter... It's another stage the earth is going through.. remember the earth was once a huge ball of fire... there are natural pollutants such as volcanoes... and then there is us... do we need to take steps to reduce it where there is the availability.. absolutely.. we won't be able to completely stop it ... but if we can take small steps to reduce it or prolong it we absolutely should... people are forgetting the environment is our home... the trees make it so we can breathe... the Ozone layer keeps us from burning up... we need clean water to drink, we need clean soil to grow our food... we need to make sure we are protecting our environment the way it is protecting us...

Answer 6

Now for the pollution I think we should do all we can to clean it up. But even if the United States cleaned up and we didn't let anymore go the rest of the world doesn't seem to interested. At least the biggest contributers like Japan, China, S.America, and some of these others. We've tried talking to some of them but they either refused or showed no interest.

Answer 7

I think people are afraid of all the luxeries we'd have to give up. I mean, even Al Gore has 4 houses to heat and a private jet that's not run on water. The other side is all the money certain people are making in the destruction of our planet.

I actually enjoy conservation. It's kinda a game for me to see how little trash I can produce.

BTW, I'm a Christian Conservative.

Answer 8

All the scientists aren't saying that, just the ones that they pay to.

Answer 9

Because it becomes a matter of almost religious fervor -- people hold an arbitrary believe that something is a particular way, and they react violently to anyone who challenges that belief. So much so they won't even discuss the issue.

Sadly, that sort of mindset is too common in many situations.

Answer 10

If there is ever any demonstrable PROOF found, I might agree. I will fight to the bitter end to prevent the US from committing economic suicide to combat what might well be a natural phenomenon.