Abraham Lincoln was elected President of all the United States of America, and always considered those who tried to start a new country not as rebels but as his fellow countrymen who went astray.
On a superficial level, one could say that for most of his terms in office, Lincoln represented the Northern states, but this would be incorrect; there were pockets of Union sympathizers in eastern Tennessee (Sevier County voted to stay in the Union, and still is very proud of the fact), parts of Arkansas (Newton County), and even Texas, where some German-Americans were slaughtered by the Confederates for being True to the Union.
At the same time, there were Confederate sympathizers in Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, as well as western Missouri and western Kentucky.
The American Civil War wasn't a cut and dried conflict between North and South--Lincoln was always out to reconcile things whenever possible.
2007-04-14 10:51:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by KCBA 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Abraham Lincoln, when elected President for his first term, won the majority of the popular and electoral vote. Therefore, using the same definitions we use today, he "represented" the entire country, every state and territory. During the Civil War, when he was re-elected, the Confederate States had not won the war, therefore their secessions were not in any way legal. So, even though he was essentially re-elected by the Northern states, he still "represented" the entire nation. Had the Confederacy won, and the U.S.A. recognized it as a separate nation, he would have represented the remaining portion of the country as President. Most of all, as a famous biographer wrote, Mr. Lincoln represented the Last and Greatest Hope on Earth.
2007-04-14 10:58:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by andromedasview@sbcglobal.net 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Abraham Stinkin (usurper of the form) issued the emancipation proclamation (reprinted in yet another answer) that substitute right into a warning to each and all of the States that seceded that in the event that they did no longer return to the Union of States interior of a hundred days, the slaves in those States could be held to be loose and slavery outlawed. It did no longer be conscious to those States that did no longer secede. if fact be told, this is probably going certainly one of the justifications why there's a West Virginia and a Virginia. The western area of Virginia did no longer choose to secede so Congress acted at as quickly as to create a sparkling State. an engaging aside for you is that this actuality: The Civil conflict began in 1861 and the Emancipation Proclamation substitute into issued in September of 1862 and took bring about January of 1863. If the Civil conflict substitute into approximately slavery, how come no slaves have been freed until 2 years AFTER the conflict began? The usurper substitute right into a front guy for Northern industry and alter into supportive of limiting distant places commerce. that would desire to have positioned undue, unconstitutional concern on Southern industry and compelled Southern states to purchase extra costly Northern industry products. (for this reason the declare of 'usurper'). that's what the Civil conflict substitute into approximately. besides, all slaves have been freed after the Civil conflict led to 1865 with the ratification of substitute 13 on December 6, 1865. So Stinkin did 'loose' some slaves, in spite of the undeniable fact that it wasn't out of compassion for enslaved people, it substitute right into a device to aim and stress the Southern States to rejoin the Union. Stinkin cared not extra approximately those slaves then he did with regard to the form.
2016-11-23 20:10:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The best part!
2007-04-14 10:42:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sangamon County. ;-)
2007-04-14 10:51:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Erik Van Thienen 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
union, north.
2007-04-14 10:45:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by WonderWoman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋