2007-04-14 08:03:55 · 18 answers · asked by intheskeye 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I don't think so.....I believe that she doesn't even deserve any more attetion on this matter. Everyone knows she is a liar that was just looking for $$$$. It sucks though that she has made a bad name for women and people will question women more when they claim rape. I think we should all chip in on a one way ticket to Iran.........She puts those guy's through a living hell.
2007-04-14 08:10:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I believe Nifong knew this woman suffered from mental problems and used it to his advantage. Her mental state would need to be examined to determine if she knew this action she was doing was wrong, it appeared to me she did because of the civil lawyer that was waiting in the wings to pounce on the Duke guys, that ain't going to happen. This is an injustice to the accuser and the three men. Nifong should get the fullest weight of the law against him and it already started with the NC bar telling him that all charges are STILL pending against him, we will need to wait until June to see what happens to him as for her that will be looked at carefully as well. The AG stated that NO criminal charges against the accuser due to medical history, as for civil action the same history would be used and she most likely would not pay anything, but we will see.
2007-04-14 08:21:32 · answer #2 · answered by sirmrmagic 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
From what I understand of what was said by the new prosecutor that dismissed the charges, he things that she actually believed her statements. If so, it would be difficult to justify a criminal prosecution against her and nearly impossible to convict.
The Lacrosse players might have a claim against her and the original prosecutor for malicious prosecution/abuse of process.
2007-04-14 08:34:39 · answer #3 · answered by Carl 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah. The fact is she false reported an incident and ruined the lives of these young men. Maybe that'll teach college boys to stay away from strippers.
2007-04-14 08:08:32 · answer #4 · answered by ladyscott 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Send her to jail for as long as the accused would have been in prison. Make the false witness server ALL their terms consecutively.
2007-04-14 08:08:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes i believe she should get charged. It's because of her and women like her that the women who truly gets violated have such a hard time getting the ones that actually did it charged and/or convicted.
2007-04-14 08:08:21 · answer #6 · answered by Proud mommy of 2 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, and regrettably they don't look to be going to record expenses. i wish the lads that have been accused sue the hell out of her. they could not win money yet she might have that civil judgement for something of her existence. they might desire to additionally sue the state. That b*tch could spend time in penal complex.
2016-10-22 04:06:51 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes..if they prove she falsely accused them...that has not been shown....less than 33% of rapists are convicted....just because charges were dropped does not mean they were innocent...it just means there was not enough evidence...do you know how many rapists use condoms now or days?
2007-04-14 08:13:31 · answer #8 · answered by Dr. Luv 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. In fact they can sue her for false info
2007-04-14 08:08:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely YES !
She should get, if convicted, just as much time in the slammer as her victims would had they been falsely convicted.
2007-04-14 08:06:50 · answer #10 · answered by John16 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋