English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have answered several questions which have related to Iraq and the Middle East. In my opinion the basic problem is the State of Israel that was imposed on the Plaesitiians in 1947 (or there about) that is the problem and the yanks who arm them. Answers that put the blame for the situation in the Israeli and yankee court have been removed as a violation, seems to be censorship to me. Any one else agree?

2007-04-14 06:02:08 · 65 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

and no I am not a Arab, just someone who is rather fed up with the ***** footing round the Israelis and their attitude to the rest of the world.

2007-04-14 06:43:49 · update #1

I see that I am nor allowed to put the word ***** and footing in the same sentense.

2007-04-14 06:46:14 · update #2

the word they keep errasing is p u s s y lets see if puting spaces between the letters fools the auto system.

2007-04-14 06:47:19 · update #3

emiss, The British were in Palestine to enforce the 20000 Jews a year that was the original arrangement dating from the 1920's. The mass immigration started after WW2 and flooded the area with European, mainly German, Jews. The British Army and Navy, enforcing the then mandate, were embroiled in a terrorist war with the Jews. It is from this activity that Israel was formed. As I understand it the British got out for lack of support from the rest of the world and only after the murder of their soldiers.

2007-04-14 18:09:46 · update #4

65 answers

Yahoo seems to censor a number of questions automatically if they contain certain word combinations. Questions with Saudi Arabia, Oil, Dollar, Israel and Iraq in them don't seem to make it to posting.

2007-04-14 06:09:10 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed Bob 5 · 24 2

Well I’m an American (not a Yank- lol) but I don’t support Israel or the Palestinians. It’s just a tiny strip of land and I say let the idiots blow each other up if they want to but keep the U.S. out of it.

It’s interesting because I’ve read about how General George C. Marshall (of the Marshall Plan) warned Truman not to allow the creation of Israel to begin with simply because they would never be able to defend themselves and they would be forced to rely on powerful nations like the U.S. for security. Of course that is exactly what has happened. Truman didn’t want to do it but there was a lot of lobbing so he just went along with it. Of course there was a huge guilt trip over the Holocaust and I can see why they would want their own country but we’ve now created a perpetual system where Israel will always have to cling to the West and the Middle East will always hate the West. It’s been over sixty years now with no end to this mess in sight.

Incidentally, you can’t type “wet-back” without the hyphen either because I tried to use it in a post about derogatory words for groups. I really hope people will get out there and test censorship though. It’s one thing to keep someone from being lewd, hateful, or employing spam- quite another to block a legitimate opinion about politics.

2007-04-14 21:00:32 · answer #2 · answered by Savalatte 3 · 4 0

I would hope not, however, there is a possibility.
I doubt it, have you seen all the comments that say something like "Bush is a moron"? I have seen some anti Israel type comments, and anti Jew type, but have no idea how long they last. You would not be able to construct software that could pick out what you are suggesting. It is always possible that you have been picked out for special treatment, if you have made a lot of adverse comments against America or Israel. Maybe linking the two in the same sentence is enough to make you worthy of a look over by certain secret institutions? I don't think that they have got the manpower to do that.
When there is a problem they just indiscriminately harvest more data. Everybody is getting there private info spied on. All this serves to do is to heap haystack after haystack on the elusive needle they are supposed to be looking for. Perhaps they don't really want to find it? The more terrorist activity out their, the safer there job. Did you know that the C.I.A. actually sponsored the Mafia just after the end of WW2 & that they were responsible for acts of terrorism in Rome?
http://www.paranormalnews.com/textfiles/conspiracies/Arthur_E_Rowse_The_Secret_US_War_To_Subvert_Italian%20Democracy.txt
There was a tv program about this, hard to believe that they would think this acceptable isn't it?

2007-04-15 10:33:08 · answer #3 · answered by funnelweb 5 · 2 1

We find it absurd that we can answer a question on this web site that is censored off and we appear to be angry, and even if this doesn't affect us, willing to kick up a fuss about the idea that we don't have freedom of speech.

Yet, around the world - even in GB and in the US - people are persecuted by relgious leaders and governments in an attempt to prevent freedom of speech.

The best example in the states is in Guantanamo Bay where captives are held without free speech. Does this not cause us to think that, in the same way as on this site, something is wrong.

In GB, we were recently presented with a report telling us how many thousands of £s MPs use flying up and down "green" Britain. Embarrased by what the report found, back benchers as well as some high profile MPs are calling for the Freedom of Information Act to be redesigned, giving MPs exclusive exemption.

We question Yahoo's policies now, but should we not be worrying more that on holiday/vacation this summer you could brake an Act preventing Freedom of Speech?

2007-04-15 03:50:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I just answered a couple of questions regarding Iran and the whole question has been deleted, there was nothing wrong with the question.
I think that judging by the questions and answers it is clear that the US and the UK goverments are in trouble, they are barley legal and people know that. The media will not cover it so as to keep the status quo and places such as these are heavily censored to mantain the status quo. But still, even after the censoring Blair and Bush and Jews are probably the most hated characters in a lot of postings.
Just goes to show how under the thumb media is, if it weren't our goverments would be doing other things.

2007-04-15 10:24:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Welcome to Politically Correct freedom of speech 101. The lesson is that your PC people at the site have set the computer in such a way that anything which could possibly offend anyone is banned. I tried a screenname of xxratxx [the x stands for a letter] but could not use it, because the word for a large mouse-like rodent, rat, was not allowed. Netscape will not allow the word for stingy, niggardly [n-i-g-g-a-r-d-l-y] to be used and there is nothing wrong with the word, which has nothing to do with black people.

In most situations like Israel vs Palestine there is more than enough wrong done by all sides. The Jews who survived the pogroms and Hitler were determined to have their own country, their ancestral country, and they were willing totake it. When the Arabs came to exterminate them in 1948 the Jews did not march meekly to the firing squads or ovens, they fought back. Unfortunately for the Arabs they won and have continued to win. Israel belongs to the Israelis by right of conquest. If you don't believe that, then there is no UK, Alsace and Lorraine should be returned to Germany along with Silesia and East Prussia, a chunk of Poland needs to come back from Russia and a piece of Finland too. Australia and New Zealand have to be returned to the natives and so on.

If you do not use intemperate language you should be able to post any opinion. Even Netscape, as PC as they are, doesn't censor opinion.

2007-04-15 17:21:26 · answer #6 · answered by Taganan 3 · 1 1

a million) i imagine you're misreading a number of it. 2) some elements were extremely violent, yet keep in recommendations the way the global replaced into then. 3) it replaced into actually thousands of years in the past. like attempt to comprehend how lengthy it replaced into... imagine the time span between Jesus and now. ... the worst of the events, i'm quite positive occurred some thing alongside the strains of THAT span of time... previous to Jesus. 4) Jewish lifestyle has better lots because that then. 5) lookup some heritage on the church... theres violence there that compares to the historic stuff, at the same time as occuring a lot extra those days. 6) study into the heritage and a large number of the flaws suitable to the european colonization of north u . s . a .. some quite terrible stuff, ... decrease than 2 hundred years in the past. why ought to a present day, non violent better human beings, be embarrassed about having began out 4000+ years in the past being lead by technique of warlords? are you positive the technique of life YOU descended from isn't as undesirable or worse? or has performed equivalent or worse, a lot a lot extra those days? the Jews have not had such violence in over 2000 years. maximum different cultures that still exist, have. please do tell... what lifestyle/human beings/team that has been round for more effective than one thousand years that does noo have some atrocity less than their belt? about the in elementary words one i will imagine of precise off is the yankee Indians, and they are helped by technique of having been isolated in evaluation.. a minimum of the Jewish one's are thousands of years in the past. and before any of you anti-Jewish liars come out talkinga bout the present warfare with the palestinians, the Jews did not start up it. lookup some heritage.

2016-12-04 00:46:54 · answer #7 · answered by troxell 4 · 0 0

You will find that an ant can't sneeze in England unless we get permission from Israel and America. Even then they would rather it went to Germany and sneezed.

People on these sites assume that if you have anything bad to say about Israel you must be a Muslim or Arab, apart from stupid people everyone else in the world knows Palestine was stolen, it is not Israel, the only way a country could be stolen would be if the Americans have anything to do with it.

Imagine if the British people were told that another group of people would take over their beloved country and they would have to find another because the other group had more money- Oh sorry they have, its Yankland round here now.

2007-04-15 11:25:09 · answer #8 · answered by The Face 3 · 3 1

This site is heavily censored. My messages about Americans, Israelis, or even Muslims and Blacks have been censored not to mention giving views on g*ays and l*esbians!! But this is life and we have to accept that yahoo is American owned and if we don't like the censorship then we should find an alternative. They think we are all based in China, we are now facing draconian censorship in the west tanks to Americans!!

The penalty for censorship is 10 points + another 3 points!!!

2007-04-15 08:38:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

May be they censor it or not but they are the biggest culprits when it comes to vetoing UN resolutions which demand Israelis to behave or to respect the the previous UN resolutions. Therefore USA is embroiled in defeating humanity and creating atmosphere of fear&terror.
USA was attacked on 9/11USA government has been killing people all over the world ever since in the name of fighting terror. Which is only an excuse since they have been going against the very UN wishes they are now crowing to the world about. For example Iran ??????????????

2007-04-15 15:12:56 · answer #10 · answered by hopeless 4 · 2 0

Until the Palestine / Israel situation is resolved there will never be peace in the Middle East. Both America and Israel need to wake up to that reality.

Even then I suggest that because of the hatred that a small section of the Middle East has towards the West and our way of life there will never be a complete peace and there will always be some one with a grudge big enough to set off bombs, kidnap and kill innocent people.

It's a sad state of reflection when you think that both religions supposedly preach peace and understanding towards their fellow man.....

2007-04-14 16:43:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anchor Cranker 4 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers