Why physicists don’t want to recognize a important simple fact?

Question

Now it is considered that the Universe,
as an absolute frame of reference is in a condition of T = 2,7K
(rests of relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change
and decrease down to Т=0К, isn’t it?
Now everyone knows, that absolute temperature T=0K
cannot be reached. But is it enough reason to think
that space T=0K doesn't exist?
If Columbus did not discover America,
there was not America, was it?
We have all theoretical and logical rights to investigate
the vacuum T=0K.
Therefore, why physicists don’t want
to recognize this important and simple fact?

Answer 1

HUH!

If Columbus did not discover America, there was not America, was it?

Therefore, why physicists don’t want to recognize this important and simple fact?

What fact? You jump around so much (Columbus?) that I am not sure what fact you are trying to state!

Answer 2

i am sorry but you do not understand a simple fact. vaccum cannot have a temperature. u cant say that temperature of vaccum is 0 K. temperature is produced by mass and energy combined and till you have no mass, you cannot talk about the temperature.
and one more thing, time has been assumed to flow in the direction in which the entropy increases, that means, over time, the entropy and temperature of the universe is increasing, so the universe will not undergo cooling in the future. it was in the past that the universe was cooler and as we go backwards in time, the rate of heating increased as time did, that means the universe was at the state of 0 K before an infinitely long period of time, and that supports some more theories that the universe is infinite if we talk of both time and space.
this is true that there was america before columbus proved it was and falling trees produced sound even when there was no one to hear it. but in this case, its like there was god even before anyone saw it (i say this because i am an atheist), because there is no 0 K in vaccum, as you cannot talk about temperature when anyone out of mass and energy is missing.

Answer 3

You are free to investigate anything you like and others are free to ignore you if they like. It is a free country. All that other stuff, about the cosmic microwave background being an absolute reference frame and Columbus and space T=0K and so on is nonsense. Space has no T, it is only matter in space that has a temperature, space itself is nothingness.

Answer 4

Depending on the amount of dark matter in the universe one of two things may happen. If there Is enough dark matter the universe will eventually contract and possibly expand after a new big bang (the big-crunch hypothesis). Otherwise the universe will continue to expand and entropy will cause the entire universe to reach a stable temperature well above 0K (the heat-death hypothesis). So the answer to your question is that the temperature of the universe will not approach 0K.

Answer 5

i think i understand what you are trying to say. but your logic is off a little bit. the microwave background is leftover radiation from the big bang ie. light or heat. but space itself has no temperature its just an emty vaccum so when the microwave background reaches zero the the light (heat) wont exist. its not the universe that will dissapear its just the light that was left over from the big bang that will dissapear. i hope this helps!!!!!!

Answer 6

put down the physics book and pick up the grammar book, when you can actually write a question with anything that vaguely looks like correct grammar then ask your question again and i will do my best to answer it

Answer 7

The amount of scientist that you speak of, are only a few thank god, and do not sway the thoughts of the majority.

Answer 8

It's obvious that you don't know what you are talking about.

Answer 9

it seems like you enjoy pissing on someones parade.