If you make all Americans work for their welfare and government support, who would the liberals buy votes from?
I like the idea. I say send them to Sheriff Joe
We need more of this.
Update on Joe Arpaio
TO THOSE OF YOU NOT FAMILIAR WITH JOE ARPAIO
HE IS THE MARICOPA ARIZONA COUNTY SHERIFF
AND HE KEEPS GETTING ELECTED OVER AND OVER
THIS IS ONE OF THE REASONS WHY:
Sheriff Joe Arpaio
(In Arizona)
who created the
"Tent City Jail":
He has jail meals down to 40 cents a serving and charges the inmates for
them.
He stopped smoking and porno magazines in the jails. Took away their
weights Cut off all but "G" movies.
He started chain gangs so the inmates could do free work on county and
city projects.
Then He Started
Chain Gangs For Women
So He Wouldn't Get
Sued For
Discrimination.
He took away cable TV Until
he found out there was
A
Federal Court Order
that
Required Cable TV For Jails.
So He Hooked Up The Cable TV Again
Only Let In The Disney Channel And The Weather Channel.
When asked why the weather channel
He Replied,
So They Will Know
How Hot It's Gonna Be
While They Are Working
ON
My Chain Gangs.
He Cut Off Coffee
Since It Has
Zero Nutritional Value.
When the inmates complained, he told them, "This Isn't
The Ritz/Carlton.
If You Don't Like It,
Don't Come Back."
He bought Newt Gingrich' lecture series on videotape that he pipes into
the jails.
When asked by a reporter if he had any lecture series by a Democrat, he
replied that a democratic lecture series might explain why a lot of the
inmates were in his jails in the first place.
More On The Arizona Sheriff:
With Temperatures Being Even Hotter
Than Usual In Phoenix
(116 Degrees Just Set A New Record),
the Associated Press Reports:
About 2,000 Inmates Living In A Barbed-Wire-Surrounded Tent Encampment
At The
Maricopa County Jail Have Been Given Permission To Strip Down To Their
Government-Issued
Pink Boxer Shorts.
On Wednesday, hundreds of men wearing boxers were either curled up on
their bunk beds or chatted in the tents, which reached
138 Degrees
Inside The Week Before.
Many Were Also Swathed In Wet, Pink Towels As Sweat Collected On Their
Chests And Dripped Down To Their PINK SOCKS.
"It Feels Like We Are In A Furnace,"
Said James Zanzot,
An Inmate Who Has Lived In The TENTS for 1 year.
"It's Inhumane."
Joe Arpaio,
the tough-guy sheriff
who created the tent city and long ago started making his prisoners wear
pink, and eat bologna sandwiches, is not one bit sympathetic
He said Wednesday that he told all of the inmates: "It's 120 Degrees In
Iraq And
Our Soldiers Are Living In Tents Too,
And They Have To
Wear Full Battle Gear,
But
They Didn't Commit Any Crimes,
So Shut Your Damned Mouths!"
Way To Go, Sheriff!
Maybe if all prisons were like this one
there would be a lot less crime and/or repeat offenders.
Criminals should be punished for their crimes - not live in luxury until
it's time for their parole, only to go out and commit another crime so
they can get back in to live on taxpayers money and enjoy things
taxpayers can't afford to have for themselves.
If you agree, pass this on. If not, just delete it.
Sheriff Joe
was just re-elected Sheriff in Maricopa County, Arizona.
2007-04-14 06:32:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't know about 8 years. And forcing them in to pay us back? They didn't choose to be on welfare, their parents did. I think anyone not graduating into college or some form of higher education should be conscripted for 4 years, and then be given assistance with education. Gangs exist because the members can't provide for themselves. Get them a college education and the experience the military offers and that could be changed. Same with illegal immigrants. 6 year service and citizenship. I agree with your basis, but perhaps the politics of whiny liberals is under thought in your statement. I wish the government would stop being so "kind hearted" and be more realistic. Kindness is good but our deficit shows we need to change something. As said above, you will have to provide for these people. That alone is expensive.
2016-04-01 01:29:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My boyfriend has been saying that for YEARS. I have been absolutely shut off to even entertaining the idea. I was like "no, the military will be stronger if it has only people that wanna be there" but when you say it like that....why shouldn't they?? And we seemed to have done better in wars passed that sent just about any able bodied soldier into the fray. But a lot of lives were lossed. But I guess the baby boomers could credit their existense to combat. Yeah we are fighting a war now, and so people don't like talking about putting more soldiers into harms way. But I have many air force friends that are BEGGING to be sent away and they are passed up time and time again. Who knows...your son might not go and they have gained an education and experience so he can learn a valid trade other than drug trafficking.
*not all children who were on welfare growing up become drug dealers. (disclaimer)
2007-04-14 06:08:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Welfare should only go to the elderly,infirm/disabled/orphans and those uncared for/abused kids. Everyone else must work, train and actively pursue their quality of life...
Everyone has opportunity,free education
Those that don't pass muster can be placed into well supervised low level jobs and alter their job opportunities if they are willing to learn skills and responsibility... ...or starve,commit a crime and go to prisons where they work all day and do not get TV, cable, libraries, work-out equipment etc..
People who chose to become leeches/thieves cuz have A"right" to be treated fairly with respect is garbage
The federal Government was never designed to be every one's mamma ...did pioneers get fuel subsidies, $$because mother nature caused crop failure/floods/storm damage..housing, food stamps, and a medical treatment facility ...WELFARE is NOT a one time fix for a setback..it has become the greatest threat to our society as we breed generations of families "who don't gotta do nothing because the state/feds will help me get food/housing/reduced charges on my cable bill.just like they did 4 my parents ..just gotta get all the stuff into the system to collect..
All societies need responsible adults...not twits who insist they can live a good life off the backs of the working stiffs.
2007-04-14 12:00:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by cyansure 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The British army have objected to National Service since WW2 on the grounds that they are well trained professionals and they don't need to be saddled with a million deadbeats who don't want to be there.
I don't know if the US army wants a bunch of thugs, thieves and dealers.
The modern soldier needs to be a computer programmer, policeman and a diplomat. They cost many thousands to train. Its not just a question of shaving your head and stopping a bullet for your country anymore.
2007-04-14 06:04:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by shell 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
So why should the poor "welfare thug" go to the military while the rich thugs go to a government subsidized federal country club. Or worse, just get a little slap on the wrist along with a $20 million dollar golden parachute.
Or perhaps you can tell me which is worse, someone who robbed a 7-11 or someone who robbed 5000 employees of their retirement funds.
Or maybe you can tell me what's worse, someone who steals a car or the people who support dictators despite their brutal nature.
Perhaps you could enlighten us who is worse, a purse snatcher or the companies that shield millions of dollars from taxes, taxes which could go to things like providing armor for our troops.
If you think "welfare thugs" should be forced into conscription, your views are quite narrow indeed.
~X~
2007-04-14 06:14:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by X 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
So shouldn't Jenna and Barbie "pay" the same way for six years in a posh mansion at taxpayer expense? I bet somebody could come up with designer camo for them and color coordinated M-16s. The Sandbox NEEDs them. No sooner do the Brits send Harry than the elites consider that there should be a Plan B for them. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2007-04-14 06:05:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
But then who would run for political office in he Democratic Party? Who would replace Teddy Kennedy, Marion Berry William Jefferson and the rest of the criminals in the party ?
Its a bad idea.
2007-04-14 06:11:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by proffesorlibtardo 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I knew many outstanding Marines who came out of poverty and broken homes.
The difference was their mothers made them go to school and behave themselves.
The answer is a disciplined education.
Drop out of school,you belong to the military for 6 years and they will provide both discipline and education ,their way.
2007-04-14 06:09:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why would we want that thug in our military? We wouldn't.
In my experience, the life of many of our "welfare" youths are already screwed up by the time they are old enough to join the military.
Of course, I do get to see primarily only the ones who end up in the system, so I admit to a bias.
2007-04-14 05:59:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
3⤋