after Indias poor performance in the world cup, should the indian senior players be banned from playing for india in international matches ?
2007-04-14 04:31:20 · 12 answers · asked by Sakcham B 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
nah they should be fined instead.
2007-04-14 08:15:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
These seniors get every thing in life. They are millionaires, with women after them, cozy cars, apartments etc. They play for themselves and not for the country. In India we have cricketers from Maharashtra, Karnataka, Delhi, Utranchal, Bengal etc and not from India. We have a selection committee which is highly partial. They all make millions while the common man pays them by buying tickets and items ( of companies who pay these buggers lots of money).
Poor and small country players from Sri lanka and Bangala play so good but these fellows enjoy and get defeated by everybody in the world except by Barbados, which entered only now. Next time they will also defeat us.
They should be stoned to death.Shameless fellows.
2007-04-14 04:49:08 · answer #2 · answered by rajan l 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it is fair to the senior players to brand them this way. If you look at the average age of players from other top teams, (Australia, South Africa etc) their average age is 30+ while India is 27.8
So i don't think age or the length of time in the team is reason for bad performance, rather, it's ones own approach to the game.
Yes they are rich, but they've worked for it!!!
2007-04-14 09:24:16 · answer #3 · answered by nadi_cu2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No player can be banned from playing a game. They can only be dropped from the Team. The players, who are not at all performing to their potential consistently should be dropped from the team irrespective of whether they are seniors or juniors
2007-04-14 06:15:16 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How Can you ban anyone from playing cricket? It's the selectors job to select the players and they should look into the age factor. It is stupid to talk about "banning" the players.
2007-04-14 04:46:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely. The seniors players are nuisance to the game. And only one senior player should be allowed in the team. And in no way the Captain should be given so much powers that it should throw the team in to the drains.. No favours should be allowed at all. No way.
2007-04-14 07:46:38 · answer #6 · answered by Jewan P 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of the suits I even have seen it truly is John Davison from Canada who's 40 years and 308 days previous, yet he's Canadian and is retiring in one greater journey. you will possibly be questioning of Muttiah Muralitharan who's 38 and 332 days previous. you're able to be able to additionally be questioning of Sachin Tendulkar who's additionally in the previous age pensioner class for a cricketer at 37 and 325 days, yet he's not the oldest in the worldwide enjoying cricket in this worldwide cup.
2016-12-29 09:52:28 · answer #7 · answered by nicoll 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Banning is not the answer.However no one should take his place for granted.Deserving seniors on form(among existing 15) and freshers may be selected in the ratio 75%:25%.
2007-04-14 05:00:11 · answer #8 · answered by karikalan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hello there this is Ana just come across a site during the India-west indies and India srilanka although they have a small score card but there audio was fantastic and was really successfully enjoyed by me the site was http://www.action8cricket.com
if you all think i delivered best then enjoy.
2007-04-17 01:06:58 · answer #9 · answered by Ana 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, they should be asked to go and make the room for the new younger talented players who are concerned about game and not money
2007-04-14 04:45:36 · answer #10 · answered by Paresh P 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-04-14 20:51:01 · answer #11 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋