I know Bush cant run again but who would u pick for prez?
2007-04-14 03:36:19 · 25 answers · asked by littleironchef 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush can't run but his younger brother Jeb Bush (former govenor of Florida can. I would have to go with Bush, because Obama doesn't have much political experience. Plus Obama's views are a little to liberal for me. I believe democrats are trying to turn America into a socially liberal society like Europe. With liberals in power our society would lose its moral character.
2007-04-14 03:43:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
I realize that Bush can't run again, thank the Gods.
But if he could, I would vote for ANY other carbon-based life form before I would ever vote for Bush.
His appointment as "president" by the Supreme Court will go down in history as the single worst disaster to befall the USA.
BTW, KennyRay, the majority of our Founding fathers were NOT Christian and they all had a profound fear of Government/Religion entanglement. America was never a "Christian" country, isn't now and never will be. America is for all peoples and all beliefs, including lack of belief. It is for good reason that separation of church and state is enshrined in our Constitution.
You sound like Ann Coulter and I do mean that as the egregious insult that it is.
2007-04-14 10:58:54 · answer #2 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Obama. Bush needs to be held accountable for his actions. Obama promises a step in the right direction and listens to the people. Luckily, Bush can't run again anyway.
2007-04-14 11:56:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I believe Bush to be an marionette for Cheney and the rest of BushCo to operate as they see fit!
To me Bush has been a fraud and a failure when it comes to serving We The People.
I would rather vote for an unproven man like Obama than a failure that has none nothing to help We The People.
2007-04-16 12:14:42 · answer #4 · answered by controlac 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't plan on voting for Obama, but hypothetically if I had the choice between those two only, I'd pick him over Bush without a moment's hesitation. Hell, I'd pick damned near anyone with a pulse over Bush without a moment's hesitation. I'll get thumbs downs from Neocons as per usual and, also as per usual, that's OK.
2007-04-14 10:43:16 · answer #5 · answered by David 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
George W. Bush is a leader with the protection of all of us and the preservation of our country in his heart. Everyone who is not supporting the President's efforts is a traitor or a terrorist sympathizer or a terrorist. In time of war, there is no fence to park your donkey on.I am a Christian, as were all of this countries founding fathers. If you atheists, muslims, agnostics and democrats have a problem with where you are then get the blankety blank out of dodge. There is real serious work to be done and it needs to be done by men and women who have the intestinal fortitude to hang in and hang on. John Kerry and Teddy boy Kennedy can just slip on their burkas and slip out of town. The war on terror is real and needs to be dealt with.
2007-04-14 11:33:45 · answer #6 · answered by Kenny Ray 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Obama
2007-04-14 10:40:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
As you just said, Bush can not run. A very hypothetical question.
2007-04-14 10:38:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Obama, because he seems to have a very level head on his shoulders, and I think the "dirty politics" of the Bush Administration is downright disgraceful. I also don't like most of Bush's policies, and now so does the majority of the US.
2007-04-14 10:40:53 · answer #9 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Dumbya has always belonged in a zoo with other monkeys. Like Leogirl said, he is good only for those with no brain.
2007-04-14 10:45:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋