English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-14 02:23:42 · 14 answers · asked by NO SOUP 4 U! 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Liberal- then you shoundnt say how cons are taking away your rights with it!

2007-04-14 02:29:23 · update #1

shouldnt- my bad!

2007-04-14 02:30:26 · update #2

14 answers

Did you know that Hillary and Obama are both left wing Marxists?

2007-04-14 02:26:21 · answer #1 · answered by Delphi 4 · 3 2

I agree with "koalatcomic" 100%. But he forgot the firing of secret service agents for telling about her temper & the stealing of the furnuture from the White House, or the lost F.B.I files that she found after looking for them for 6 months & finding them on a hall way table.So she is flip-flopping on the patriot act. What is differant this time. She did as Bill did, checked the wind to see which way the polls were blowing then voted. Thats how both parties work but libs are better at it. No one expects anything else from a lib.The Cons are learning to test the polls but have not caught up with the libs yet.It is a race to see who can lie the best & the libs are still winning. The Cons are behind but catching up in a hurry.It is truly a sad day in America.We have lost all our heroes in Washington.

2007-04-14 02:53:01 · answer #2 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 0 1

Any port in a hurricane. each and every so often the small print take longer to artwork out. i ask your self what proportion authorized of the "No new child Left at the back of" guidance Reform AS we've now a miles better extreme college dropout fee than formerly this technique AND we rank ineffective final in guidance of any industrialized us of a. Does the Patriot Act guard us from the risk dealing with ourselves as a rustic that only won't be able to shop up and prioritize while it includes our childrens?

2016-10-22 03:36:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Of course they did. Democrats are historically authoritarians. In principle, they ought to be more comfortable with the Bush League agenda than the old-time Republicans should. Frankly, I think we've got a better chance to turn this country back around by nominating a maverick Republican than by trying to find a Democrat who really, in principle opposes the president. I just don't think they're going to make any changes.

Ron Paul for President.

2007-04-14 02:28:01 · answer #4 · answered by skip742 6 · 1 2

One of the wonderful things about being a Democrat is that I'm allowed to disagree with my Representatives.

I think they were wrong to do support that, as were the Republicans who supported it.

That was easy.

2007-04-14 02:39:19 · answer #5 · answered by Steve 6 · 0 0

It seems you can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time.

Nothing you do or say can smear the democrats worse than the republicans have already smeared themselves.

Conservatives can kiss power goodbye, probably for the next 20 years.

2007-04-14 02:28:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Wouldn't surprise me. When the chips are down they are about as liberal as Bill O'Reilly's left foot.

2007-04-14 02:28:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes, both parties are against the American way and right-wing

2007-04-14 02:28:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I'm surprised that "hill" would do that...isn't it likely that the Patriot Act could find out the truth about Vince Foster.....


...did she think we forgot....


.

2007-04-14 02:30:04 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 1 1

thats about the only correct thing she did...what about the clinton legacy she was part of that every pelosi ite seems to want to ignore?

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-04-14 02:26:27 · answer #10 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers