Five reasons to abandon your faith in evolution?

Question

1. The original theory holds no ground what so ever. All the first ape human bones were a hoax!
http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter9.php

2. The missing link to proving humans were apes is missing still today!
http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter10.php

3. The variations in human skulls does not mean that those skulls evolved from apes. All these classifications are really only variations and unique races in the human family. The difference between them is no greater than the difference between an Inuit and an African or a pygmy and a European.

4. Scientist are confused as to what is true and what isn’t:
Most of the participants at the Senckenberg conference got drawn into a flaming debate over the taxonomic status of Homo erectus started by Milford Wolpoff of the University of Michigan, Alan Thorne of the University of Canberra and their colleagues. They argued forcefully that Homo erectus had no validity as a species and should be eliminated altogether. All members of the genus Homo, from about 2 million years ago to the present, were one highly variable, widely spread species, Homo sapiens, with no natural breaks or subdivisions. The subject of the conference, Homo erectus didn't exist.

5. I have supplied you with evidence that blows Evilution out of the water. It’s taken on faith, the proof is not solid, and questions are not answered. Now lets consider the REAL truth. God created us. I will give just one example. Our eyes. Here is what the founding father of EVILUTION had to say about the human eye. DARWIN: “To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.”

Answer 1

The problem with missing links is people always assume they exist.

How many links will you be content with?

Answer 2

1. That's three debunked, only another 17 types of homonid to go!

2. Fossils are rare. Quite astonishingly so. Something has to die where in the future it will firstly not be eaten or otherwise decompose, be covered by the right materials to make fossils, and be discovered. It is perfectly possible that there will be no consistent series of fossils. However, if you look at a fossil like 'lucy' (Australopithecus afarensis) you can SEE that it is neither ape nor human.

3. This is a lie, as is 'racial difference in skull shapes' - I've never heard such tripe. Here is a photo of an Asian skull http://www.skullsunlimited.com/graphics/BC16-lg.jpg and a ******* skull http://www.skullsunlimited.com/graphics/BC154-lg.jpg Why don't you actually LOOK at them? You can see with your own eyes they are almost identical in every respect except nose shape. Humans have astonishingly little variation between races. Look at how different dogs are! Compare that to a neanderthal skull http://www.geocities.com/palaeoanthropology/nean2.gif - you can see the forehead is almost non-existant, the jaw is massive and square, and there is a huge brow ridge. And that is from a species which is possibly the closest thing to us that ever lived that didn't become us. Nothing like the others is it?

4. Scientists have taxonomical debates all the time. Saying something doesn't exist because it's taxa is changed therefore means geraniums don't exist. It is simply a re-ordering and consolidation of existing species, instead of creating a new one every time a new subject is found.

5. Proof taken on faith is not proof. Just because we don't understand how our eyes evolved it doesn't mean we never will. The only people who can answer everything now are religious people, because they have one simple explaination for everything; God did it - we can't understand God. You may as well say it was all done by magic.

Answer 3

Watch or read "Inherit the Wind" and pay attention to Darrow's examination of Bryant with regard to the time before day and night were created.

There is no inconsistency between the possibility (which I happen to strongly believe in) that God created the universe, the earth, humankind, etc. - and evolution.

Certainly there are some unresolved issues about "proof" of evolution - that's exactly why it is still the THEORY of evolution. While there is tremendous factual evidence to back up the theory (unparalleled by evidence supporting any other hypothesis or theory) and evolution is often treated as "fact" just for practical day-to-day purposes, it has not been conclusively proven. I doubt that it, or any other theory of the origins of humankind will EVER be proven. Evolution is simply, by far, the closest explanation that fits with the scientific record.

Why are you so adamant that God's design did not include evolution?

Why are you so convinced that God would ever reveal the secrets of creation? Particularly to YOU above all others? I know that "all things will become known unto thee" but "God [also] works in mysterious ways."

Humankind is, according to the Bible, not meant to know God or his works on the level you wish. Remember the tower of Babel? If we, on our own behalf, attempt to obtain such knowledge of God he will make it impossible. We learn and know only what God allows us to learn and know.

God created our ability to reason, examine evidence, create hypotheses and theories and test them. How dare you, with very little factual evidence and only slight doubts about what God has already caused or allowed us to learn, use your own version of what you *wish* to be true to undermine the truth God has revealed to us thus far?

That, sir, is blasphemy.

Answer 4

I've just read your introduction, with a few extremely weak and badly phrased 'arguments' and 'facts' some people sometimes might present to debunk evolution.
I think this is an interesting approach, to first give us the
'because it is so' line of reasoning, anybody can dismiss
without any problem whatsoever.
And then come up with 5 great arguments!.
But why did you suddenly stop.

Where Are The Five Reasons !!.

If we're talking science than give me facts, or at least defensible theories.
You haven't even been able to come up with an
interesting question.

Answer 5

You have supplied no evidence whatsoever. You have supplied statments (and personal conclusions) from sources that you personally choose to accept.
Of course, scientists are arguing. So are others, you included. The only thing that this proves is that people disagree.
This is a religious sermon, in the pretense of a question. The God I accept is not found of pretense.

Answer 6

You know that "hoax" you point out? Did you know that it was a Christian that perpetuated that hoax, and that it was evolutionary scientists who exposed it as a hoax?

Bet your Creationism "scientist" leaders neglected to provide that little detail. (They tend to do that. A LOT.) If you want facts, and not lies, bent truths, and pseudo-science, try a REAL science website, not that Christian-agenda driven joke of a website evolutiondeceit.

Answer 7

Love how you guys try to take a few random things, use them out of context, and declare you've "proved" something. If this was a test run take it back to the drawing board. It's not working.

Answer 8

"The original theory holds no ground what so ever."

"It’s taken on faith, the proof is not solid, and questions are not answered. "

wow, so you choose to believe a book that was written 50-150 years AFTER Jesus was crucified, a book that has been translated into numerous languages over 2000 years, a book with gospels that conflict with each other even on the place that Jesus was born and who was there?

OK...

Answer 9

I am actually curious as to why the lower classes enjoy the maxim of the "strong have the right to dominate the weak"

I do hope that the common people understand that by accepting this idea, that would mean that those men in power have the right naturally to control and dominate you.

If you read Darwin, it is clear that he was not talking about apes.. He was talking about people.. it was allegory.

Answer 10

What about the influenza virus which mutates every year?

Natural selection, the basis of it states that those creatures which die off, are dead, and do not survive, but those which survive, live and go on to reproduce.

So you are saying that it is not true.

What is untrue about "What dies dies, and what lives, lives"?