Because it seems with every passing month, a new scandal involving the White House seems to embroil it for a time--before a new one pops up!
2007-04-14 00:07:58 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes, not only will it be classified as the most scandalous, Bush will be declared the worst President ever in the history of the U.S. especially if it is eventually proven that we were misled into a premptive war that was not necessary.
2007-04-14 00:19:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Personally, I think it's all political. If you look at Bill Clinton, he seemed pretty embroiled in scandal's as well. But they both pale in comparison to Ulysses S. Grant. He had the most corrupt administration ever. He had people doing things that not even Bush and Clinton would try. One of the major reasons he had so much corruption was due to the rebuilding of the Southern States after the war of Yankee Aggression (the American Civil War.) I guess they just couldn't resist the robbing and raping of the south.
2007-04-14 00:19:17 · answer #2 · answered by Robert L 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No. In this day and age with 24/7 cable news coverage, lawmakers want to see and hear themselves and want to stir the pot. This is here to stay I'm afraid. The Clinton administration is the scandalous one and the Carter administration was the "Disastrous Years." Bush will be forever linked with the 9/11 tragedy I believe.
2007-04-14 00:20:47 · answer #3 · answered by Gene 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, that was Clinton. These will be known as the Incompetent Years or maybe the Inept Years.
2007-04-14 02:58:42 · answer #4 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That has been normal during the second term of every president who served two terms since Nixon's time. It has become part of the upcoming presidential campaign for the opposing party in congress to start muck racking prior to the campaign.
They discredit the party in power to help their future candidate. Whatever evil characteristic they can tag on the present office holder, their candidate will present himself or herself as opposite.
2007-04-14 01:23:52 · answer #5 · answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, he hasn't been personally involved in any scandals like Clinton was.
2007-04-14 04:47:20 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Iraq will be it.
Most of the "scandal" is total screw up's by incompenant people.
When you will only hire yes men/women what else can happen. The whole bunch will be making a new movie when this is over called "The gang that couldn't shoot straight II"
2007-04-14 00:20:09 · answer #7 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Every president has scandals while in office and every president cleans up after the last one,when the hell are people going to realize that its the same thing over and over and over?
2007-04-14 00:18:34 · answer #8 · answered by JOHN D 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
His "legacy" will be known as the "United States Under Siege Years".
2007-04-14 00:11:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
You have to remember, just because the Democrats keep trying to "create a scandal a day until 2008" doesn't mean they actually exist......They are just another name for rumors and we know what they say about rumors......so no.
2007-04-14 00:11:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋