Have you watched her on Bill's show the last 2 days?
She's like a venom dripping little snake!
Why would anyone set themselves up for people like her to attack?
2007-04-13 17:57:20 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She IS a political prostitute for O'Reilly!
Her head spins faster than Bill's!
2007-04-13 18:05:57 · update #1
I don't know why anybody besides conservative Republicans take Fox seriously, period. It's such a joke.
They probably think that any exposure is good exposure, but they obviously don't understand how the whole thing's set up to put them in the worst possible light.
2007-04-13 18:00:57 · answer #1 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Dems won't debate on Fox because they are pandering to their whacko, conspiracy-laden, base which helps them in the primaries (Republicans move to the right during their primaries also, don't get me wrong). The Move-On.org crew and the big donors love to talk about Fox being biased and the news crew starts their day by planning their attack on kind-hearted Democrats.
As for Michelle Maulkin....ummm, she is a columnist. She writes books, columns, and gets a pretty good living by representing the kind of people who enjoy her on TV. BUT, Michelle Maulkin will NOT be moderating the debate. Bill O'Reilly will NOT be moderating the debate. Sean Hannity will NOT be moderating the debate. However, they will all comment on the debate no matter what channel it's on anyway....sooooo I'm not sure why Ms. Maulkin is brought up here. Democrats/Liberals need to simply to open their mouths to "set themselves up for people to attack" them.
So, the Dems turn down the channel that pulls in roughly 2.5 times the amount of CNN viewers. In doing so they ignore and insult those viewers, many (perhaps even the majority) of whom don't like the Democrat message...In other words, the people who will not vote democrat currently, and now they won't see/hear anything from that side which could, possibly at least, persuade them to reconsider their vote.
It's strategies like these that lost them the White House, the Senate, and the House back in the 80's, 90's, and as recently as 2004. Soooo.... decline away Dems!
2007-04-13 18:18:16 · answer #2 · answered by Hal L 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
FOX information is conservatively biased. every body who claims in the different case it really is only in denial. Even FOX's own bureau chiefs have admitted that FOX is conservatively biased. in addition they declare that FOX's visitors comprehend it, though apparently the visitors do not favor to admit it. CNN and NBC are not to any extent further biased. If something they war to allure to better visitors a similar way as FOX and lean somewhat to the right. compared to FOX effective, they're liberal. compared to FOX, each and every thing is liberal! final analysis is that FOX places a conservative spin on each and every thing, and there is not any reason behind Democrats to enter their Spin Zone. a minimum of CNN and NBC make better of an attempt for honest and balanced reporting than only asserting "seem at us, we are honest and balanced. honest! do not you've faith bill O'Reilly?!"
2016-11-23 18:41:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only one spewing the venom (and lies) last night was Malik Shabazz.
Here's a guy who doesn't believe in our justice system. The Duke lacrosse players are still guilty in his mind, even though an ATTORNEY GENERAL realized there was zero evidence against them, other than the lies of someone with her own criminal past.
Shabazz and those who believe the way he does are what is wrong with race relations in this country. Period.
2007-04-13 18:15:10 · answer #4 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The dems do not want to debate fox new for the same reasons that the libs here just debase the president. They are basically gutless cowards.
2007-04-15 06:19:57 · answer #5 · answered by edward m 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fox is not News it is strictly a propoganda station for the Bush Whitehouse, no democrat would be givien a fair shake on any of its programming. Those who watch it are just lemmings.
2007-04-14 04:25:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If only you realized the irony of this question.
Democrats won't debate on FOX because Bill Clinton got walloped by Wallace. And Democrats are going to have to back off and change their position, because America watches FOX. It will be interesting to see them flip-flop.
2007-04-13 18:26:05 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yeah... she's rediculous...
LAST TIME I READ HER... and probably last ever... she said that all Democrats hated authority... and her reason was... CYNTHIA MCKINNEY, when she slapped the gaurd... (this was during that big hub bub)
I NEVER HEARD ONE DEM SUPPORT THAT ACTION ONE TIME? in fact, ALL I HEARD SAID IT WAS HORRIBLE... and she couldn't even get through the primary in her own district because of it...
COULD THE PARTY SUPPORT HER ACTIONS LESS?
yet, MALKIN painted them all the same with no fact, logic or reason... she's a joke... and she doesn't even try to hide it...
I was half mad after I read it and half laughing at the total disregaurd for logic, fact or making even a point... at least Rush tries to look sensible compared to her...
2007-04-13 18:12:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, This is why:
And it is true that Barack Obama is on the move. I don't know if it's true that President Bush called Musharraf and said, 'Why can't we catch this guy?' - Roger Ailes
Roger Ailes is the head of Fox News.
They lost any claim to legitimacy with that statement.
2007-04-13 18:03:14 · answer #9 · answered by Vegan 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Fox is Pravda, Volkische Beobachter.
Anybody who knows anything knows that a) it's wrong on most major issues and b) it was just set up to serve Rupert Murdoch's business agenda. You'd have to be a pititful idiot to think it's 'news'.
But as the documentary 'OutFoxed' proved, Fox News viewers are the most likely to think falsehoods are true. Another word for this is... 'idiocy'.
2007-04-13 18:04:23 · answer #10 · answered by llordlloyd 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋