I am voting for her when she receives the nomination.
2007-04-14 01:13:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by leonard bruce 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No way. Too many "close friends" of the Clintons died of questionable causes when they held their strangle grip on the people of Arkansas.
2007-04-14 06:34:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by George 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I answer your question with a big F*CK NO! I'd rather eat a pile of sh*t than vote for that scag! We don't need no lame *** socialist leading this nation to be called the United Socialist States of America!
2007-04-14 00:39:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bunz 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
NOT JUST NO BUT I MEAN NO!!!!!!!!!!!NO!!!!!
I'M FROM ARKANSAS AND I KNOW HOW SHE WAS HERE AND SHE IS NOT PRESIDENT MATERIAL TOO MUCH BAD RUBBISH FOLLOWING HER AROUND .LIKE THE MENA ARKANSAS THING AND THE WHITE WATER SCAM HER AND BILL WAS PART OF AND A MURDER THAT LEANS THEIR WAY
2007-04-14 00:54:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by gingerbell 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Socialists for 2008!!!
Edwards or Clinton...
We need to a leftist to offset the mess the right-wingers have made.
After four years, then we can go back to the center...
2007-04-14 00:38:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Julian X 5
·
3⤊
4⤋
Democrat regardless of candidates names
2007-04-14 00:53:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rikjard M 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Depends on who she ends up running against, doesn't it? In the primaries, no, I wouldn't. In the main election if she gets that far...maybe...
But the opposition would have to be pretty bad.
2007-04-14 00:33:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by joecool123_us 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
She doesn't want to be president. She wants to be the Queen.
2007-04-14 00:31:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by TedEx 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Anybody that is not a republican, my grandpa always told me that the Democrats give and the Republicans take away., wow was he right.
2007-04-14 00:33:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by sidekick 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
That harpy? I'm still trying to collect a compendium of ugly names for her/it/thing.
2007-04-14 00:32:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋