..being blind or deaf?
2007-04-13 14:38:39 · 54 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
For me, blind. My best friend is a music teacher and she says deaf would be worse for her.
2007-04-13 14:45:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being blind, for one will never be able to see the wonderful scene of life. In addition, mobility affects a blind much more than a deaf. It's sometimes said that it's best not to know something. So I guess in that sense being deaf isn't that bad compared to being blind.
2007-04-14 19:34:25 · answer #2 · answered by LucKY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blind
2007-04-13 14:43:01 · answer #3 · answered by johN p. aka-Hey you. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blind
2007-04-13 14:41:36 · answer #4 · answered by Incognito 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blind
2007-04-13 14:41:18 · answer #5 · answered by Miss T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being Blind.
2007-04-13 14:41:31 · answer #6 · answered by xojj4lyfexo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I answered a question similar to this last week.
If I were blind I'd take Braille-and get a good dog.
If I went deaf I know sign language- Be Blind would be worse.
2007-04-13 14:43:53 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being blind would be so much worse for me because I am a voracious reader, if I did not have books to read, I really think I would be impossible to live with. That is the truth...wouldn't wanna' be deaf either, but think I could deal with that.
2007-04-13 14:43:20 · answer #8 · answered by altruistic 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no doubt about it.....being blind!! even if u can`t hear you can at least see or read writing or read lips or communicate in some way..that`s not to say that if u r blind u can`t communicate. however , i personally would rather be deaf than blind......just my choice.
2007-04-13 14:47:11 · answer #9 · answered by heather h 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being blind
2007-04-13 14:42:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋