English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Liberalism is far from god's view of the civilized and proper thought. It is like an apple turning rotten. In no way is it normal and it needs to stop now.

1. Liberals support gay marriage, which is against traditions and humanity.
2. Liberals are for free love, which is not right and inappropriate as it spreads STD's (god's disease to stop free love) and kills people
3. Liberals are more caring of animals than human lives by supporting sickly abortions and camapigning for animals' rights at the same time.
4. Liberals support lazy welfare users more than hard working educated people on Wall St.

After reading all four points, I have come to the conclusion that liberals contain immoral and inapproriate thoughts that are rotten to say the least. Anyone with me on this one?

2007-04-13 14:06:27 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

26 answers

Everything you have stated is a lie. Just look at bush & cheney's administration (& cheney's daughter's lifestyle) & tell me you're serious.

2007-04-13 14:12:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

I'm a Republican and a conservative by registration. But:

1. I don't care if people are gay, if they want to get married (why make the same mistake 50 percent of all straight people make?)

2. I agree with free love and believe STD's are the result of careless sexual activities not God's wrath.

3. I care deeply about being kind to animals and humans, I support a woman's right to choose and don't believe the government has any business trying to outlaw it.

4. I don't support lazy welfare users, but believe that some public support is necessary to make sure people don't starve or die for lack of food, housing or medical attention.

And I am against the death penalty. And oh yes ... I think that the Moral Majority stinks like an open sewer. Most of the moral majoritarian leaders I have seen are the poorest examples of human beings. They represent the exact opposite of the Christian ethos the profess:

1. They lie openly about even the seemingly stupidest things.
2. They are vengeful of their critics or those who refuse to support their position.
3. They judge when they ought not to.
4. Some are child molestors.
5. Some are rapists.
6. Some are drug abusers.
7. Some are a combination of the above.
8. Some are hypocritical homosexuals that stay in the closet while condemning homosexuality publicly and text message Congressional pages for sex.

Do you think any of those people are normal? No!

I am ashamed of my party. I am also ashamed of the Democrats who have an equal number of morons in their leadership.

Its time for a change already.

So there you have it. A pox on both parties.

In short, the average moral majoritarian leader in this country has far more to hide than your average Republican who is not a moral majoritarian.

Born again Christians and Moral Majoritarians STOLE my political party from me.

2007-04-13 14:35:43 · answer #2 · answered by krollohare2 7 · 3 0

-Your assumptions are based on the idea that all liberals have but one voice. That's your FIRST mistake!

Liberalism is far from god's view of the civilized and proper thought.
- Right, love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek, such conservative values (sarcasm).

In no way is it normal
-Then ye hath failed ye olde History class, all societies must progress, or they fail (Ex: Soviet Union) America is more liberal in 2007 than it was in 1970, more liberal in 1970 than 1950, more liberal in 1950 than 1920, more liberal in 1920 than 1890, etc.

1. Prove that gay marriage will harm humanity in any way. Sweden's marriage rate is going up for the first time in several decades. Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate in the nation. You know interracial marriages went against traditions... It was traditional to keep women in the kitchen making babies.

2. Again wrong, free love and safe sex are two totally different subjects. Some on the right want to prevent kids from knowing anything about sex, which is far, far worse than giving a teen a condom. Very few people are for free love these days because we know what it can do, we progressed in thought. If we decided to ban condoms and teach only abstinence after the sexual revolution, STDs would have been far more rampant then they are now. I personally think both would work, abstaining and teaching safe sex.

3. Not all, in fact not many at all. Those people are the extremists, hell I'm feuding with one of them over issue of animal rights (My English teacher no less). Do the God Hates F@gs people represent all Christians? Do the Black Panthers represent all blacks. Hell, even some vegetarians oppose PeTA, ALF, ELF, and Greenpeace.Whether or not abortion is wrong/sick/murder is purely opinion. I believe when the fetus can survive outside the mother's womb (About the fifth month), then it is a life. That is my belief based on the evidence presented before me. (The earliest preemie that survived outside of the womb was four months premature.)

4. Welfare is a form of government support. Minimum wage is a form of welfare, so is health care, so is social security, so is unemployment.do you oppose those as well? Would you deny Medicaid to the poor? That's not very Christ-like. In fact that's rather immoral...

I have come to the conclusion that you only see in black and white, and can only understand moronic talking points.. You may E-mail me if you wish.

2007-04-13 14:42:37 · answer #3 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 3 0

"1. Liberals support gay marriage, which is against traditions and humanity."

I'm a liberal, and I'm opposed to gay marriage.

"2. Liberals are for free love, which is not right and inappropriate as it spreads STD's (god's disease to stop free love) and kills people"

I'm not for free love, if by "free love" you mean recreational sex. That's not responsible.


"3. Liberals are more caring of animals than human lives by supporting sickly abortions and camapigning for animals' rights at the same time."

I'm opposed to abortion on demand, and I think most animal rights activists are nuts!


"4. Liberals support lazy welfare users more than hard working educated people on Wall St."

Most of the people on Wall St. manipulate money without creating a single thing. That's worse than abusing welfare. And most people on welfare do not abuse the system. To the contrary, the social safety net in the U.S. is woefully inadaquate to meet real and urgent needs.

So much for your stereotypes.

2007-04-13 14:15:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

1. Conservatives believe that only people who have different reproductive organs can love each other. This is wrong to assume.

2. Conservatives would rather govern what you do in your personal life, than what you do with your finances.

3. You can't legally regulate morals. Let women choose. Animals cannot protect themselves.

4. When there seems to be more people than jobs, and half those jobs require a 4-year college degree, I'm more in favor of helping out single parents with kids, then letting them starve. Yes, the system is abused. But they still do better good than bad.

2007-04-13 14:16:58 · answer #5 · answered by amg503 7 · 5 0

properly, first of all, maximum democrats/liberals nonetheless help the U. S.'s immigration themes... over 70% of the inhabitants needs a halt on immigration. those are all themes that are immoral to YOU. to no longer human beings. The immorality is maximum probable based on your faith. the countless products on your record are truly indefensible including pedophiles, state enemies, eco terrorism... in spite of the undeniable fact that, there are some issues that human beings sense are as much as them, no longer YOU. as an occasion, abortion. isn't that a determination it rather is superb left as much as the mum (and probable father) fairly than somebody such as you who has no theory who the mum is? shouldn't that be between her and her god? comparable is going for gayness and medicines. How does any of that quickly influence you? It doesnt. To me, it rather is the finding out factor. If it quickly impacts human beings or the community at super, it truly is misguided. in spite of the undeniable fact that, however if it truly is a private determination then you definately ought to get your nostril out of it. Why do you sense which you are the form of "solid" guy or woman which you will dictate morality to others? "permit he who knows no sin forged the 1st stone," stated Jesus. i'm doubting that guy is you.

2016-12-29 08:21:42 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Not everyone is a bible-thumping person such as yourself. All these points you give are religion related, but isn't there supposed to be a separation between church and state in the good ol' USA?
I wish people would stop stereotyping liberals, and republicans for that matter.

2007-04-13 14:18:46 · answer #7 · answered by justagirl 3 · 3 0

Who the hell wrote this, Jerry Falwell!!!! I'm not a Liberal and yet I see the hypocrisy in this question. You claim to love mankind then you criticize those who don't walk the same path as you. I can tell that God's views are seen by you and those ultra right Christian hair brains that think that only they have a ticket to heaven and are the only ones who know the Lord. People like you will never see the gates of heaven you hypocrite!!!

2007-04-13 14:37:12 · answer #8 · answered by supressdesires 4 · 4 1

I think you’re spending too much time thinking about gay marriage, welfare, free love, etc. The immoral thoughts are apparently your own obsession.

Try to find a worthwhile hobby and a lot of those immoral thoughts will be pushed out of your mind.

2007-04-13 14:18:05 · answer #9 · answered by tribeca_belle 7 · 5 0

"liberalism is far from god's view of the civilized and proper thought" do you speak for God??

in the biblical account of Jesus, He is tolerant of other races, creeds, etc. in my opinion, he seemed more a liberal than a conservative.

also: you're fourth point doesn't seem to agree with mainstream interpretations of the bible either. it always seemed to me that the bible was saying "help the poor". you're saying "help the rich get more rich"

2007-04-13 14:25:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I don't agree on the first two, but I do on the last two. Liberals are slow to condemn, no matter what the situation. It's their way of being tolerant, helpful, sympathetic and understanding. I'd call them more misguided than immoral overall. As far as the appropriateness of their thoughts is concerned, they can't be helped and can't be affected by your moral code, like it or not.

2007-04-13 14:18:36 · answer #11 · answered by oogabooga37 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers