How are the Democrats allowing President Bush to hide his weather machine?

Question

You know...the one he used to cause Hurricane Katrina to mess with the black people in New Orleans?

I'm sure he's using it to cause snow all over the country...

How is President Bush such a moron, but has all of these conspiracies working for him, and nobody's challenging it?

Elvis Ain't Dead! 9/11 was an inside job! Bush as a time travelling Delorian! The attack on the USS Cole was Bush using his time machine! IT'S ALL TRUE!!!!!!!!! IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IT YOU'RE A LEMMING!

YYYYYYEEEEEEAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I forgot to tell you that he's using his weather machine to counter the arguement of global warming...give it time...it will be accepted as such.

Answer 1

No nonononono, ROVE has the weather machine... we let Rummy use it for a bit, but apparently New Orleans and Baghdad are spelled a little too closely (idiot).

Cheney has the Cloak of Invisibility (like you couldn't see that one coming) - stole it off some goofy teenager in a London Train Depot - that caused an international incident - let me tell you.

Time Machine got stolen, Bush left the damn keys in the ignition. It's somewhere in Compton, and the Army is refusing to go in to recover it. We're trying to get Cheney to use the cloak, but no one can find him.

Keep an eye out, will ya?

Thanks,

Answer 2

Your typical right-wing talking point is: "Democrats got the same intelligence and reached the same conclusion, so blaming Bush for misleading America is purely political." Then there is the use of quotes about the threat posed by Saddam that turns out to be from Bill Clinton, John Kerry or some other Democrat. The conclusion is that if Bush was lying, they must have been lying too. There is a false assumption underlying this argument, namely that Dems received the same intel as Bush (they didn't), but setting that aside, here are two reasons why this is a straw man: (a) The issue is not whether people believed Saddam had WMD (many did), or whether there was any evidence that he had WMD (there was), it's the fact that Bush and his administration made an absolute, unconditional case with the evidence at hand, brooking no dissent and dismissing doubters inside and outside the government as cowardly or treasonous. That's what "manipulating the intelligence" and "misleading the public" refers to--the knowing exaggeration of the case for war (whether by cherry-picking intel or using defunct intel or by speaking about ambiguous intel in alarming absolutes). There we were, more than a decade after the first gulf war, two years after 9/11, and Saddam hadn’t attacked us, he hadn’t threatened to attack us. And then suddenly, he was THE biggest threat to America--a threat that required a massive invasion. A bigger threat than Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Iran, Bin Laden. A HUGE, IMMEDIATE threat. It simply defied belief. (b) In addition to the fear-mongering described above, the contention that Bush 'misled' the public is not simply about Saddam's WMD, but about the way the administration stormed ahead with their plans and invaded Iraq in the way they did, at the time they did, with the Pollyannaish visions they fed the world, all while demonizing dissent and smearing their critics. In both (a) and (b), the crux of the issue is proportionality. Whether or not Bill Clinton or France or the U.N. believed Saddam was a threat, the administration's apocalyptic words and drastic actions (preemptively invading a sovereign nation) were decidedly out of proportion to the level and immediacy of the threat. THAT is the real issue.

Answer 3

Why can't people accept warm weather in the winter as a gift.
I loved the warm weather in January and continue to dislike this cold ice age coming weather we have been experiencing. Where is spring Al Gore, you energy wasting Jackass!

Answer 4

What kind of crazy are you? You people that believe
Bush is responsible for every darn thing under the sun
that goes bad are so immature, duped, and gullible.
Now he's responsible for the weather?? Wish I could
see his weather machine that you're referring to...it
must be a dandy. You all may change your mind about
Bush when those terrorists return to attack US again.

Answer 5

You are laying it on a bit thick. I know Bush wishes he was that power-full. There would be nothing for his detractors to say. I expect he would have as many followers as Bill Clinton & since he hasn't lied under oath none of the detractors.

Answer 6

I wish he would make his weather machine keep the midwest a little warmer.

I was all pumped up for this global warming stuff but where did it go? Did Bush shut off his machine? The temp has been below average for over a month and not one story about global cooling.........

Answer 7

I only believe 1/2 of what I hear & 1/2 of what I see. Right now after seeing this question I dont believe anything.

Answer 8

So that's who caused our last storm here this week.Damn him my fuel bills are high enough.Guess we better get some OIL over here.Hurry up and WIN in Iraq.Yeha ! Strap that rifle on boys!

Answer 9

Bush tortured Saddam into telling him HOW TO HIDE THINGS that everyone KNOWS is there deary.

Our President learned from the Master of hiding Mr. Hussein.

Answer 10

Well see - there it is. He promised them he would end global warming with it if they left the secret a secret. Also, the weathermans' union contributes to the Dems and they don't want the secret out either.