http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070413/ap_on_re_us/duke_lacrosse_nifong
After all, he's obviously only interested in righting injustices against African-Americans...even if it involves railroading innocent people who happen to be white.
So where are the defenders of this gross manipulation of the justice system now? A few months ago, they were everywhere. Today, they are strangely silent.
2007-04-13 13:05:58 · 5 answers · asked by Rick N 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
regenetech: No, they don't. Provide a credible link or be shown to be a troll.
2007-04-13 13:12:53 · update #1
ooops..had to re-read your question ...for a sec. there i thought you said he was only interested in getting votes from a mostly black area.....they need to charge him/convict him/and send him to a state pen....im sure some other ppl in the pen he probably railroaded would love to have him as a cell mate.....
also i hope that anyone that was convicted while he was a prosecutor will have their cases re-opened.....
2007-04-13 13:13:34 · answer #1 · answered by bluesharpman_642000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not shocked at all because I spent a lot of time around prosecutors. 99% of them are great people, 1% are political hacks and I could see that in Nifong from the beginning. The sad thing is that I also see it in Johnny Sutton and I can't wait until he gets exposed for the scum that he is.
2007-04-13 21:53:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nifong wasn't interested in righting injustices against African Americans. He was interested in getting re-elected in a predominantly black district. This was not about justice, it was about narcissism and self servitude.
John, like no con has ever lied or deceived anyone. Give me a break. Mark Foley, Tom Delay or Skooter Libby, or Jack Abramoff ring a bell?
2007-04-13 20:09:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Prosecutors lie and manufacture evidence every day. Nothing new.
2007-04-13 20:09:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
He's a lib.
End of story
2007-04-13 20:08:29 · answer #5 · answered by John 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋