Certified 150 wpm no errors in 1974...still do a minimum 90-100 depending on copy. Good enough for you?
2007-04-13 11:26:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Baby'sMom 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Let me try and do this. So far, I am not doing too bad with this. I notice that every so often, I catch the wrong letter, and have to delete it, and find the right letter, which is right next to it. I know that I cannot do this on a permanent basis, but I was able to answer your question without looking at the Keyboard.
2007-04-13 11:36:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by powersbt 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have to look at the keyboard all the time for the numbers and sometimes for the letters.
2007-04-13 11:30:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've been typing that way since I was 15 and I'm now 59. Doesn't make any difference if I type numbers or letters.
I also type pretty fast. 90+ wpm
2007-04-13 11:32:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Barry 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm an executive assistant, so I know how to type without looking. I actually find it harder to type if I look at the keyboard.
2007-04-13 11:27:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Evil Girl Geniuz 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I type fast and I don't have to look at the letters or numbers.
2007-04-13 11:26:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lexy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can type fast either the letters or the numbers Lucky me
2016-04-01 00:36:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can type without looking with both. But, on the #'s I have to use the square of #'s on the right.
2007-04-13 11:38:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by buddythedog 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
well.....100 plus a minute...typing all over the keyboard!!!
10-key over 4000 strokes no ewrrors 5 min.
fast fingers. ahahaha
2007-04-13 11:48:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by -------- 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can type without looking at the keyboard.
But, I have to look at the numbers when I want to type out numbers.
I don't use the numbers very often.
2007-04-13 11:31:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋