2007-04-13 09:51:56 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Newborn & Baby
A baby is never a "part" of the mother, starting at conception, even though it is dependent on the mother to live.
2007-04-13 10:04:57 · answer #1 · answered by Ĵ∞ņ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because the umbilical cord is connected to the placenta which comes out of the mother at birth along with the baby. It's not like the cord is connected to the uterus. It is connected to the baby.
2007-04-13 10:01:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, the baby is generally capable of sustaining it's own life at that point, it is no longer dependent on the umbilical cord after delivery.
2007-04-13 09:59:32 · answer #3 · answered by Meems 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually generally the rule of law is the baby must be completely outside the mother and then have drawn a breath.
2007-04-13 09:59:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do believe if the baby comes out and the umbilical cord isn;t cut then the baby is put back in then it is called a partial birth but i don't think theres any particular rule about just that min inbetween baby coming out and cord being cut
2007-04-13 10:01:00 · answer #5 · answered by momma 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, DNA would show they're not the same person.
2007-04-13 10:02:44 · answer #6 · answered by jelesais2000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋