English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

No matter how well someone does or how poorly, a 3% is all that is given. No merits, no bonuses. I would like to draft a proposal to them convincing the board to invest more in their employees and reduce costs in hiring. Big turn over at this non-profit. Any websites or advice would be welcome. I need a plan.

2007-04-13 09:44:45 · 8 answers · asked by pebbleknot 1 in Business & Finance Careers & Employment

8 answers

At least you are getting an increase; whether your performance is good or bad. I cannot even get a review let alone a raise where I'm at. I've been here for almost two years and can not get even a Thank You for a job that is well done. I have resigned myself to looking elsewhere for employment.

In your case, a non-profit that is giving an across the board increase is a good thing. Like it or not, some people are not guaranteed what you are. If you do not like this, then you need to look outside of this area.

Non-Profit work environments have guidelines and strict budgets that they must adhere to. Your request; while in good taste, does not look at the financial aspect of the entity. They may be restricted on what can or cannot be done.

2007-04-13 10:13:21 · answer #1 · answered by kam 5 · 0 0

I say there is nothing wrong with your idea -- draft the proposal and present it to the board. Be sure to include as much as you are able to about how many employees have left in a certain period of time.

But, I think you ought to know that a lot of companies don't even give that much. I work for a for-profit company, with thousands of employees all across the country, and in other countries as well. We are not allowed to budget more than 3% aggregate for our total increases, unless we are going to promote someone. What that means is that if we want to give someone 3.2 %, then someone else has to get less than 2.8% to make it average to 3%. And, although we can increase non-managers as high as 5%, managers cannot be increased more than 3%. Fair ? Nope. So, give someone 5%, and you have to find someone worth only 1%. Why would you even keep that 1% employee. (We do have the opportunity for bonuses, but only if we reach a certain level of profit over last year in our own market.)

2007-04-13 10:03:35 · answer #2 · answered by jboatright57 5 · 1 0

Hi, I'm in HR. If you work for a non-profit that can give everyone a standard 3% raise a year, you are pretty lucky. Many non-profits struggle to give that and those that give merit raises don't often give that much or to that many people. Non-profits don't usually have lots of cash, that's how it works. I suggest you think of it in a different way and be glad you work for one that wants to help all it's employees with a cost of living raise. Bigger raises come at profit companies, but not to everyone every year, so there are drawbacks. The HR end of this is you can't do anything to convince them to change their policy. Odds are the managers and HR people go over this every year when they do the budgets. There may frankly, not be any more cash to "invest" in the employees. I work for a non profit and there haven't been raises of any kind in two years. None. Times are tough out there for all businesses but especially non-profits. I doubt you'll get anywhere, but you will let everyone know that you don't appreciate the consistent effort they are making to at least give you all something. Get my meaning?

2007-04-13 09:54:08 · answer #3 · answered by hrland 3 · 4 0

Let me give you another slant on this. I'm president of the board of trustees of a non-profit. I'd love to give our employees more money. They're an absolutely great bunch (only 3 of them, two full-time and one very part time) and all do a great job and are worth more than they're paid. We give Christmas bonuses when we can, which is most years, but they're very small, pretty much token, nothing to get excited about. We just don't have the money to raise salaries. In good years they might see raises of 4% or so, but that's about all we can do. We already do a lot of fundraising each year just to keep the organization afloat. We're a small rural public library, by the way, in case you're wondering - and no, the government does NOT pay all our costs, not by a long shot. No federal money, and the state paid around $15,000 last year toward our annual budget of about $70,000. We do get some additional municipal money, but had to convince the voters, through a tax referendum, to raise their own taxes to give money to support the library - and yes, it even surprised us when we won. Even with that money, we come up tens of thousands of dollars short of our budget every year - donations and fund-raising make up the rest.

Consider that maybe your board feels this same way, but just doesn't have the money to do anything about it. I would agree with you though that someone who does a poor job shouldn't get the raise the others get, and should probably not be there at all.

Talk to one of your board members, whoever seems like they'd be most sympathetic. They might be able to be an advocate for you, or at least let you know the reasons why raises are low. Then you can decide whether you want to stay at your job, or try for a different job where you might make more money.

If you have suggestions for cost savings, pass them on to the board. If your board is worth anything, they'll be glad to hear ideas from the people involved day-to-day.

Just my 2 cents worth.

2007-04-13 10:18:46 · answer #4 · answered by Judy 7 · 0 1

I used to work in HR for a non-profit. 3% is the average high end standard raise. Depending on the type of organization, it may be easier/wiser to implement an across-the-board annual raise, since it may be harder to determine "performance" in a non-business environment. This cuts down on favoritism and "buddy bonuses."

2007-04-13 15:16:20 · answer #5 · answered by exHR 3 · 0 0

furnish and insist If the provider presented with the aid of your NFP business enterprise is so unique or so in call for that it warrants paying the director $six hundred,000 to verify that they do no longer bypass someplace else (or into the internal maximum sector), then there is your reasoning. What could you planned to be an suitable salary, based upon your very own point of adventure in this field? Is the salary itself properly worth extra suitable than the adventure you may little doubt income collectively as working there? I have not got any doubts that possessing a Masters degree is all properly and robust. information concept is useful, yet each and every so often the practicalities do no longer fall into that 'cookie-cutter' trend that is going to make up an thought. figuring out what you comprehend bearing directly to the sensible demands for the centers you furnish could be my first challenge, if I have been a grant-making physique.

2016-12-16 05:02:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

they are non profit-so i dont see them making a whole lot-some people work for longer than that with no raise at all. i would not step on any toes. it is not your place to draft anything.

2007-04-13 09:53:10 · answer #7 · answered by buzyb 4 · 0 0

why do all employees moan?

suppose they cant all be managing directors like me.
get on with it LOL

2007-04-13 09:48:29 · answer #8 · answered by stephen w 1 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers