English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

The 130,000 part yes. Jimmy Carter, no

2007-04-13 09:44:28 · answer #1 · answered by Centurion529 4 · 7 0

I remember the Carter Presidency, and if it had endured to today somehow, I might very well have 130,000 in the bank - enough to buy a cheese sandwich.

2007-04-13 09:46:59 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2 0

I'd rather face down a dozen jihadis in Iraq with only a butterknife to fight with than see that POS Carter within 100 yards of the White House again.

2007-04-13 09:47:09 · answer #3 · answered by George D 3 · 2 0

I dont't think so. I had the 130 when carter was president and was lucky to escape without declaring bankruptcy.

Can you say prime rate at 17%

2007-04-13 09:59:39 · answer #4 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1 0

Well, a few hundred folks could pool their 130K and pay the Iranians to release the U.S. hostages they held. J.C. certainly couldn't make it happen.

Oh, and to the fellow that mentioned 15% mortgages, for a few weeks mortgages topped out at 21% during JC's reign.

2007-04-13 09:50:15 · answer #5 · answered by steve.c_50 6 · 3 0

Well the 130k yes but Jimmy Carter that would be terrible!

2007-04-13 09:44:01 · answer #6 · answered by impeach_pelosi_now 2 · 6 0

Since the inflation rate was 12% when he was president my 130k would be worth a lot less.

2007-04-13 09:44:40 · answer #7 · answered by zaphodsclone 7 · 6 0

except that the money would be worth about ten cents on the dollar and youd have to deal with all the fallout from liberals whining about not enough tax revenue....not a good plan.

2007-04-13 09:44:40 · answer #8 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 1

No, because who would be able to buy a house at 15% interest?

2007-04-13 09:43:51 · answer #9 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 6 0

Like every American having 130,000$? Hell no... inflation.

2007-04-13 09:43:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers