2007-04-13 09:33:28 · 24 answers · asked by Eyota Xin 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
he would be as good as the same simple minded monkey that he already is
2007-04-13 09:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 9⤋
One of the first things he wanted to do was take away a certain group of people's overtime. I believe he would have stripped everyone of many of the gains made over the years for employees. He certainly has nothing to offer most working class Americans.
You can see what he has done for corporations, and free trade. Corruption is rampant in many arenas. Sorry, I haven't liked him or his agenda since day one. I sense he doesn't even like Americans unless they're in the top income bracket.
2007-04-13 16:56:20 · answer #2 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does how he handled Hurricane Katrina ring a bell in your mind? His daddy would be supporting him and his family cause he would have been drug to court for the Enron hearings and been sitting in a prision cell now, he should have not been exempted from his crimes no matter if he is the President or not.
2007-04-13 16:46:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually his presidency the short time before 9/11 was goin real well. Income tax cuts, estate tax cuts, education plan was in the works.
2007-04-13 16:51:59 · answer #4 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He probably would have been very good. It's too bad that Al Quaida couldn't have moved up their time table so that they could have done 9/11 when Clinton was in office, it would have been quite a show to see how the dems would have handled it.
I'm sure they would have found a way to blame Bush Sr.
2007-04-13 16:42:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
If it weren't for 9/11 Bush would be the one that screwed the pooch on Katrina and that's it.
Fortunately for the conservatives, if you don't Duck and Cover whenever you hear some politician say "9/11", you give aid to our enemies.
2007-04-13 16:38:45 · answer #6 · answered by Zenrage 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
He wouldn't have survived his first term (just like
his father)
However, during that time he would have
gutted much of the EPA and Fema - its not
clear how much the next person would have
done to fix Fema - so Katrina would still have
been more of a disaster than if, say, Gore had
won in 2000.
2007-04-13 16:37:38 · answer #7 · answered by Elana 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Al Qaeda?
2007-04-13 16:38:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. Maybe we'd get our borders protected better and our interests would be more important than those of the Iraqis. I don't think he's a bad guy, just a little stubborn.
2007-04-13 16:38:19 · answer #9 · answered by Kittieashy 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you're asking what his presidency would have been like without any terror attacks against us, it probably would have been vastly different.
We sure have never gone into Afghanistan, much less Iraq.
We'd probably also be much further along in the NAU coming to fruition.
2007-04-13 16:36:59 · answer #10 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
This is what al qaeda means......
You have heard before that "Al-Qaeda" roughly translates into "the base," but were you aware that "Ana raicha Al Qaeda" is arabic colloquial for "I'm going to the toilet"?
2007-04-13 16:38:16 · answer #11 · answered by jeb black 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋