Called: Conspiracy Nutjobs.
2007-04-13 08:45:09 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes. Kooks R Us.
2007-04-13 08:48:04 · answer #1 · answered by Matt 5 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Well maybe a kinder gentler category like Conspiracy Theories. Lol.
2007-04-13 15:48:57 · answer #2 · answered by Firespider 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but we actually need two categories
"Conspiracy"
"Nutjobs"
2007-04-13 16:36:46 · answer #3 · answered by Buffy Summers 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Seems to me that we have enough problems just dealing with the minor bumps in the political landscape without the new category. Myths are already a category.
2007-04-13 15:59:25 · answer #4 · answered by Pablo 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes. That and a Rhetorical Questions category.
2007-04-13 15:49:59 · answer #5 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Only if they make another one called: Empty Rhetoric
That way we could separate some of the legitimate questions from the partisan ranting.
2007-04-13 15:54:15 · answer #6 · answered by Beardog 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Thats an excellent idea... and I think John Doe came up with another good one.. it seems Libs lack a sense of humor, maybe he should start that category!
2007-04-13 15:59:11 · answer #7 · answered by Delia 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
That would work.
Also there should be a category for meaningless questions, stupid antedontes, lonely people's sorrows, pointless rant and rave, etc.
2007-04-13 16:00:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
There already have such a category, it's Science/Alternative. There you will find all sorts of uncorroborated reports of WTC demolition, UFO's, ghosts, etc. Interesting stuff if you're writing a Halloween oriented novel.
2007-04-13 15:50:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
Nah, they already have whole web sites where they can play.
They just come in here to see how many brain dead people they can dupe into believing their stories and follow them back to their web sites.
Just ignore them and they will eventually just go away.
2007-04-13 15:49:26 · answer #10 · answered by cappi 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋