http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2482741646574210449
This link is to a 1.5 hour video with some compelling points as to indicate the 9/11 WTC attack was an inside job.
Okay. The points are compelling. But, it raises two thoughts in my mind.
First. If it were an inside job, viewing this video makes me think Larry Silverstein was the mastermind, not Bush.
Secondly. It would have taken hundreds of people to have wire these buildings to implode, as the video implies. What happened to those people? There is no way anyone could get together a group of tight lipped people that large. At least one person involved would have stepped forward by now and ratted out the plot.
An evil mastermind would also know this in advance. Knowing that, the mastermind would have had all these worker bees killed to silence them. The killing of that many people familar with building demolition would also have been noticed or at least evident with research.
Any thoughts on these points?
2007-04-13
08:40:16
·
20 answers
·
asked by
.... . .-.. .-.. ---
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
A stupid broad told the world she gave the president of The USA a BJ just to get attention, don't you think there would be a least one idiot bragging that he helped blow up the WTC?
2007-04-13
09:21:12 ·
update #1
You can't argue with 9/11 conspiracy nuts. It's like trying to convince your 6 year old that Santa Clause doesnt really exist. You won't win the argument!
2007-04-13 08:44:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
6⤋
First concept... at the same time as did Geraldo develop into any such fowl sh*t? did not he used to have some journalistic balls or is he in basic terms attempting to get some cred by technique of giving up his beliefs? Secondly... at the same time as I truly have little question that there have been brown those with field cutters contained in the airplane waiting for his or her seventy 2 virgins, i do no longer trust they were the masterminds behind 9/11, nor do i trust our authorities's professional tale. the truth will out some day and it will be a attractiveness which will rock the ignorant's global.
2016-12-03 23:39:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by pass 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am banking on science over science fiction. I appreciate a good argument but Loose Change seems as edited as the clips placed together by Bill O'Reilly to attack Rosie O. I know people are convinced but some have also researched this for along time. Including hearing Clinton on a local Hawaii golf course spout out their were 9 specific threats against widebody aircraft in the Pacific Rim WAY BACK in 1998. If I had the tape I would be on Oprah right now not providing as much as I can to get people to wake up to this election. AND what it will cost us if HillBill get back into the White House.
Thank you for the links.
WHY NOW? WHY AGAIN? Bush is not running for re-election?
2007-04-13 09:02:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
It only takes watching 3-4 minutes into this video to already see its weaknesses.
Ive seen them all read all the pages. I watched about 10 minutes of this video but when they had the info on the explosions and designs wrong, presented the fact of jet impact in a misleading manner.
Well nothig new.
Btw, Larry Silverstein, who people say oh he profited by the insurance he took out on the WTC 7 tower. No he has lost over 70 million dollars. He still has to pay the lease, and has no renters to collect money from for the last 6 years.
2007-04-13 08:59:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by sociald 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
It takes weeks to plan a planned demolition, but only a few days to place the explosives. If thermite were used, it would take far less pounds of explosives than that used in traditional controlled demolitions. It would not take hundreds of people. It would only take a few people with complete access to the buildings.
The company that did the security for the entire WTC complex was a Bush related company (His cousin was the director and his brother was on the board).
The towers were notorious money losers because of all the VACANCIES; and Silverstein had the right to move tenants around for any reason, such as upgrading systems, or planting bombs.
Threat of death is often more than enough to silence a person, especially if that person participated in the intentional killing of 3000 innocent people.
.........................................
2007-04-13 08:56:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by ladykofnyc 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
It seems like they put the 9/11 thing on the back burner, they seem to have trouble with the Justice Department now, maybe someone who got fired might just know something and they had to get them out of there. I still need to hear the real explanation, it didn't seem to phase our President at all when he was informed, in fact he looked relieved to a certain extent. Why did he not get off of his duff, excuse himself, go do his job and find out what is going on, it seemed to me he was reluctant to even say anything about it until his aides said he must talk to the people of the Country, and they had their man picked even before it happened, and he is still at large or so they say.
2007-04-13 08:55:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
One on my biggest points is that it would take weeks of massive preparation to bring down the buildings. It takes more than a couple of discrete charges to implode a building. A team would have to go into the buildings and place hundreds or thousands of charges and wire them together. They would need to place these in key structure points and to do that they would have to go floor by floor and rip out walls to get to these points. This is not something that can happen unnoticed.
There was one guy who claimed that the buildings were closed down for of couple of weeks before the attacks. Of course, this guy could not provide any news sources to back that up.
2007-04-13 08:46:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by A.Mercer 7
·
6⤊
2⤋
WTC was an inside job. you need to stop drinking the Limbuagh Milkshakes. Look at the video you dumb bible stooges. Thats a controlled demolotion. Only way that can happen if someone plants explosives in a building. Wake up and smell the semen stains on your shirts cons
2007-04-13 08:49:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by conslovelimbaughcum 2
·
3⤊
4⤋
Ah common now, do you know how long it took me to plan that whole operation?
And that son of a B***h (Colin Powel) almost blew it.
2007-04-13 08:44:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Michael Kane 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/12/scott-forbes-interview.html
2007-04-13 09:03:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by DJ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It looks as though the "conspiracy theorists" are gaining a new convert!
After you watch your 1.5 hour video, check out the following sites. Your video was done by 911Truth and specifically designed to support their agenda. It is based on propaganda, misinformation and sensationalism.
2007-04-13 08:48:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋