the movie 300 is big lie......persians were not like that,if u know something about history...anyway if u like the movie i dont know, but be aware of the lies...those who were called persians in the movie are...i dont know.its not true,go read the history books....
2007-04-13 08:23:31 · 14 answers · asked by red_rock 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I thought it was based on a comic book, not historical fact.
2007-04-13 08:31:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It sucks massive time, however the studios do it by fact the chowderheads in theaters circulate see the remade dogs besides. that's all approximately funds, and doing a complete rewrite of a screenplay costs a lot of money what with author's contracts at present. so as that they decrease corners by dusting off the dirt from some previous movies. Now, each and every so often the remake is greater helpful. occasion: Howard Hawks's version of "the element" develop into as solid by fact the technologies of a B-action picture ought to be in the Nineteen Fifties. yet then, the remake by John chippie no longer purely had greater helpful outcomes - in spite of the undeniable fact that it observed the tale line of the unique short tale "Who is going There" by Don A Stuart. regrettably, it truly is a uncommon case. a superb form of the time, the remakes do no longer postpone in assessment to the originals.
2016-12-29 07:41:20 · answer #2 · answered by carabez 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
uhm the movie was based on real events. if u paid attention on your history class youd know it wasnt persians, they were spartans. spartans left their kids to die on a hill top if they were weak. they trained their women to excersise when back then, women werent allowed to step outside the house. they focused on military military military. that's it nothing else. it was a great movie and it really helped with my reaserch paper. you obviously have no clue what your talking about beacuse in school, in history, this is exactly what were learning about.
then u have to remember its fiction. they got the whole idea about spartans/ persians but they but its not bullseye accurate. i hope yu werent expecting that cuz honey yu werent gonna get it. did yu see troy? both were BASED on the real thing not a reanactment of the real thing. and 300 hit the spot really good.
2007-04-13 09:11:01 · answer #3 · answered by macey_brasil 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a movie, of course it is innacurate.
You say it's all lies, but it's really not as innacurate as your are trying to portray it (even if you aren't giving examples)
I still thought it was an epic movie and enjoyed it a lot.
2007-04-13 08:31:41 · answer #4 · answered by heavy_cow 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you can't say the movie sucks just because it's not fully accurate! it's a good movie about determination, despite the misleading description of the persians.. but overall, i think it's a really good epic..
2007-04-13 08:39:37 · answer #5 · answered by untouchable_bogem 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never seen it Im afraid. But what movies these days portray the true things that happened...even if it is based on a true story.
2007-04-13 08:52:04 · answer #6 · answered by The BecaNATOR 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The movie is NOT supposed to be taken as historically accurate, and it never made that claim.
2007-04-13 08:28:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all, it's a fictional movie...it's not supposed to be a movie with historical accuracy. However, that being said, none of us were actually around back then, so everything we know is partly speculation and partly relying on translation of ancient languages and such and stories passed down through time.
2007-04-13 08:32:16 · answer #8 · answered by Sunidaze 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
i am aware that some parts of the movie weren't accurate but i still enjoyed the film stop criticizing it
2007-04-13 08:28:24 · answer #9 · answered by someone 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is fiction. They are not touting that this is true facts. I thought it was an awesome movie.
2007-04-13 08:31:50 · answer #10 · answered by Feline05 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋