English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

His name is Stanley Hilton and he has a lawsuit filed against Bush&Co.

http://www.rense.com/general57/aale.htm

You all keep bashing the messenger when in fact Nancy keeps telling you the truth!!
There's several government officials telling Bush&Co. secrets!!!
Isn't it time to listen?

2007-04-13 06:50:40 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Here's Morgan Reynolds chief Economist under Bush.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8180123292618944278

Government officials speaking out!
FINALLY!

2007-04-13 06:55:39 · update #1

Not a convert---have always been suspicious of this evil corrupt government!!!!
It goes all the way back to before JFK and the people who silenced him and Bobby and MLK Jr!

2007-04-13 06:57:52 · update #2

8 answers

Yes I have read up on this situation. Apparently Stanley ended up with a bad judge who was obviously paid off. The judge threw the case out and even threatened Stanley not to pursue it. However, Stanley did pursue it in a different court. Now he had agents following him and threatening his life. They broke into his office and home they took all of Stanley's documents. Stanley was smart, by making copies of everything and hiding the originals in a place where nobody could find them. The pertinent records link Bush & Co. directly to the terror attacks of 911. They prove that Bush not only stood by while he knew the attacks would happened, but actually show strong evidence that Bush helped Mastermind the entire event with accomplices such as his brother Marvin Bush.

No wonder Bush & Cheney immediately hired agents to track and kill Stanley Hilton. This is the one man who can actually blow the lid off this and put these guy's behind bars.

2007-04-13 07:30:46 · answer #1 · answered by Ugly Betty 3 · 4 3

Here is another article about another long time Bush insider (he co-wrote the official Bush 41 biography) who basically says in his new book "Invasion of the Party Snatchers: How the Neo-Cons and Holy Rollers Destroyed the GOP" that 9/11 was an inside job.

Read it...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=WAT20070413&articleId=5381

It also has a nice section about the Hearst (yellow journalism...look it up) owned "Popular Mechanics".

2007-04-13 12:33:41 · answer #2 · answered by Perry L 5 · 2 0

I'm sorry, Dole has been out of office how long? And his chief of staff was invitied to how many secret White House meetings since, before or during that time?

And an economic advisor is qualified in what way as an expert to present facts in this matter? Has he presented any scientific facts or evidence? Or just stated an opinion, with as much or little foundations as anyone else's?

I'm all for an objective look at things, but, from the transcripts, I can think of "7 billion, 7 billion " reasons why this person might have a bit of an agenda in making claims.

Please. How about some facts of evidence, and not from a many-times discredited nut-job site with a history of making completely unsubstantiated claims?

2007-04-13 07:07:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1 3

Start with a badge pin and see if theres any reaction. Then maybe a Peacemonger Tshirt........ i.e work up to it. In life we have to stand for something or theres a real danger that well fall for anything. Oh and one more thing....always question everything you are told by so called authority figures.....always!!!!

2016-05-19 17:10:30 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Another Internet Hoax!

Only this time, Nancy/Ugly Betty/Crypto/Vato/Hippie/etc has found a convert!

Check out your source!

2007-04-13 06:54:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Hes is completely credible enough although bush supporters wouldn't believe it if bush himself told them he did it.

2007-04-13 08:15:58 · answer #6 · answered by Eyota Xin 3 · 3 1

You have as much credibility as Nancy.

2007-04-13 06:56:34 · answer #7 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 1 2

Just because you read it does not mean it is true.

2007-04-13 06:56:14 · answer #8 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers