2007-04-13 06:34:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dennis Kucinich
2007-04-13 06:37:38 · answer #1 · answered by 2 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you're referring to the Iraq War Resolution, their positions were as follows:
Kucinich voted against the Iraq War Resolution.
Obama didn’t vote for it because he wasn’t in Congress but he made a speech against going to war when he was in the Illinois legislature.
Edwards has said his vote for the resolution was a mistake. Biden voted for it, says it was a mistake, and now wants to revise the Iraq War Resolution. Dodd says he regrets his vote for the resolution. Hillary voted for it and won’t admit it was “mistake” but is calling for a phased withdrawal.
2007-04-13 07:11:19 · answer #2 · answered by quest for truth gal 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Whoever wins in '08 will be working through the messes in Afghanistan, Iraq, and probably Iran. Both the repubs and dems are pushing for armed conflict with Iran very soon, haven't you heard of the multiple carrier groups right off their coast?
2007-04-13 06:39:41 · answer #3 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
considering that there was never a bill put before congress that said anything like "I authorize the president to invade Iraq" your question is impossible to answer
2007-04-13 06:41:55 · answer #4 · answered by Nick F 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
contemporary on the day the truthfully vote happened, .....or not-----would not negate his long status and nicely documented opposition to the conflict, on an identical sound concepts that OTHERS who have been contemporary that day, stood up and truthfully voted against the conflict. Obama replaced into nicely seen element of that camp for his vocal and continual opposition. He can stand PROUD, with the individuals, who voted against the UNPROKED use of tension against a Sovereign us of a. .....and tried to pretend that a everyday STRIKE........is truthfully a "justified" Pre-emptive strike......it is a load of BULLCRAP- "Pre-emptive" strike, replaced right into a politican's be conscious, to hide up an UNCONSTITUTIONAL FIRST strike. A load crap , by using the different call, remains a load of crap, and scents an identical. Bush and Cheney, could have been dragged to the Hague, ideal next to Saddam. yet Saddam gets hanged.......and Bush and Cheney get to pretend what they did replaced into "ideal".
2016-10-22 01:55:04 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama is the only one, but he was busy messing up the state of Illinois at the time, and wasn't in a Federal position.
2007-04-13 06:41:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They're all going to say they voted against it. Some will say they voted against it before they voted for it... others will say they voted for it before they voted against it. Some will say they voted against it, but the chads were too tough to punch through. Some will say they didn't understand the ballot, but that they voted against it. And some will just demand a recount of the vote.
But ALL of them will say pretty much ANYTHING you want them to say to make you vote for 'em.
2007-04-13 06:40:36 · answer #7 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dennis the menace kucinich
2007-04-13 06:47:35 · answer #8 · answered by rbenne 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Obama while in Illinois politics.
2007-04-13 06:41:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
They voted for it when they were against it! And by God (opps sorry) they are still against it!
2007-04-13 06:40:54 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋