Morals should be conserved. Else immorality will become liberal! Don't you think?
2007-04-13 06:24:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You are truly like Shakespeare with your words.
2007-04-13 06:33:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Isn't the Right the party of the morally flexible?
Government should get out of the business of assigning morals. Too oxymoronic.
2007-04-13 13:33:55 · answer #2 · answered by kenny J 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Objective morality has no place in civilized society.
Conserving society to the point where it becomes stagnant only succeeds in breeding parasites. Like stagnant pond water.
2007-04-13 13:31:48 · answer #3 · answered by Zenrage 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be in the right is actually wrong. However, this question was probably best LEFT unanswered.
2007-04-13 13:32:32 · answer #4 · answered by mark 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can decide what my morals are.......a lot better than the republican party can.
I do NOT want the morals of Rudy, Newt, or McCain.
2007-04-13 13:30:29 · answer #5 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure. If you think that way, no one can help you anyway so just go right ahead and put a big fat label on yourself.
2007-04-13 13:28:45 · answer #6 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pass that doobie to the left cuz the right way is wrong!
2007-04-13 13:27:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Right" is always right.
Left can many times be wrong (especially Liberal Left).
2007-04-13 13:31:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Right is wrong and left is right.
2007-04-13 13:49:44 · answer #9 · answered by katydid 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is better to follow right path whether you are rightist or leftist.
2007-04-13 13:27:27 · answer #10 · answered by nightingale 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋