People still engineer the machines. The machines are not self reliant.
People must still design the machines. People are constantly improving them and developing more efficient machines. They are constantly adding to and removing from the machines to improve performance and cut costs.
People must still repair the machines. When a machine malfunctions, it cannot fix itself. People must repair the machines in order to keep them working. This also includes preventive maintenance to keep it running smoothly.
People must monitor the machines. If something happens with the machines and no one is there to fix it or report it to someone who can fix it, a company could really lose profit. Therefor, they hire people to monitor the systems in order to maintain working machines.
Machines themselves have opened jobs. Building the machines, creating software for use in them, updating them, building new hardware, etc. all must be done by humans.
Aside from that, there are many jobs machines cannot do. Machines, at this point in time, cannot reason or use even the most basic comprehension. Machines must be programmed to do what they do, they will not do more or less. Customer service is a good example of that. You can call a support line that utilizes voice recognition and is 100% automated. What happens when that machine is not programmed for your specific needs? It cannot give any different answers because it was not programmed to do it. Most people prefer to speak with a live customer support representative as well. It's easier to speak to someone with empathy and understanding rather than a machine.
There are SOME machines that can reason and use comprehension. Those machines are not mass produced, and to do so would cost more than any company would want to spend. They are for testing/development purposes only right now.
2007-04-13 05:30:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tacticious 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Work is infinite because people's demands and desires are unlimited. There is always more that can be done. It has always been foolish to expect that machines will allow people to no longer work -- that statement was as stupid in the 1920s or 1970s as we realize it to be today.
Machines DON'T do most of the work -- people do. If machines do one thing, humans can now do something else.
As machines (capital equipment) and productive processes make certain work more efficient, that just allows humans to move upscale and do something else the machines cannot do. This will always be the case: today, 10 years from now, 1000 years from now. Humans are extremely flexible and can rapidly learn to do new things; machines are not and can not.
And they will, because there will always be ambitious entrepreneurs and managers and workers who figure they can make a buck by going a step further. Idiots who thought people would embrace a life of leisure and not work never counted on Bill Gates working 7 days a week and sleeping under his desk to become a billionaire.
As for what new work people do, I can't give you a laundry list -- there are 145 million workers in the U.S. alone doing a million different things. Look around, see for yourself.
2007-04-13 08:41:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by KevinStud99 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Machines replace people when the marginal product of capital is greater than the marginal product of labor, but that does not mean those people do not wish to have employment and avoid starvation. So they either improve their marginal product through education or lower their offered wage. You see machines replace people where people are the scarce commodity and people replace machines where capital is the scarce commodity. For example, in rural Illinois there are few people so you see giant combines working on the farms, but in India where people are plentiful and capital scarce you see labor intensive farming.
People selling machines sell them near the price that they become equal to people, otherwise the demand would overwhelm their capacity to supply machines. So for a machine to replace a $10 per hour worker, the price of the machine needs amortize out at less than $10 per hour, but not an inordinately large difference.
Since people do not want to starve, they compete against the machines or they own the machines and live off the value added.
2007-04-13 05:53:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by OPM 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nickname? pookie How frequently have you ever been in love? as soon as Where could you such a lot love to seek advice from? europe What's the phrase your mom makes use of probably the most? honey... Where did you sleep final night time? my mattress How frequently did you assert "i like you" in these days? like 10 or so How do you giggle? loud and filled with guts What time is it on your subject? one million:fifty six am Do you snore? generally If you had been to be an animal, which one could be select to be? a turtle What's the rudest factor anyone would ever do to you? misinform my face Do you prefer cheese? find it irresistible Do you curse? sure If anyone had been to slap you out of nowhere, what could you do? be in surprise and cry... i am a wuss Do you pee within the bathe? no, that is gross Is your mouse presently running? yup Is your TV a flat reveal or tube? flat reveal Do you placed on lotion day-to-day? no, however i will have to What's your favourite pizza topping? further cheese How do you move the avenue? (ie: gallop, run, stroll, SKIP lol) stroll in most cases Did you believe this survey was once too lengthy? nope, i find it irresistible Should I hold going? certain :) Do you just like the colour of your couch? sure Do you also have one? sure lol Who's the character you like such a lot? my husband
2016-09-05 12:17:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by gonser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Machines don't get paid.The increased profits go to the corporations and people at the low end have to scramble around to find work since they are not needed in the factories anymore.Machines devalue humans.It becomes a simple equation of speed and economics,and human interaction become the aberration .It is a sad nihilistic devolution,that ,unfortunately,many people are buying into in a big way.mea culpa.
2007-04-13 05:29:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by kevin k 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Humans are still highly necessary to (as new inventions and technologies are discovered) cement the ticking of machine labor, and the tocking of technological revolution, as new "jobs" and "needs" for computers and the like appear.
2007-04-13 05:28:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael R 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are a lot more products and services out there, so yes productivity has gone up quite a bit and machines have replaced a lot of jobs but new jobs are constantly created in other areas
2007-04-13 05:28:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Machines break down. That certainly includes, computers, monitors, fax machines, copy machines, ATM machines, vending machines..etc. etc. etc... There are more people out there fixing them and making replacements so much for less work!
2007-04-13 05:23:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tapestry6 7
·
0⤊
0⤋