Men comes from monkey, what do you think?

Answer 1

This is the cartoon version of evolution. No actual scientist believes that. No science book says that.

This is the cartoon version that creationists like to promote because it is easy to ridicule.

Scientists don't believe that men came from monkeys, but rather than modern humans and modern monkeys came from a common ancestor. This is a *very* different statement.

It is a different statement because it gets you away from that image that monkeys are "unevolved humans", which is absurd. Monkeys are *fully evolved monkeys*. They are every bit as highly evolved as we are ... just as well adapted for their environment as we are.

Please stay away from anybody or any book or any web site that gave you the cartoon version of evolution. They are trying to deceive you.

Answer 2

May be you are right.In Ramayana a well known Hindu Epic all monkeys fighting on behalf of the hero Rama-like Sugriva,Hanuman etc are monkeys and Sukriva's Brother(Enemy) Vali is also monkey.But the wives(like Taara) of Vali, Sugriva and other monkeys are human beings!!!.

Answer 3

We did not come from monkeys or apes. imagine about the prospect persons truly evolving from some sub species. If math and technological understanding flow hand and hand lets communicate about some info real quick. those are ruff info so do no longer attempt to remark decrease back and say those are incorrect. there is perhaps a billionth of a probability that a cellular will mutate and reason some thing new. that you would see in those with down syndrome or some thing actual disorder. it really is in elementary words one cellular that mutated for the more severe and brought about some thing incorrect. that's exactly what ought to ensue if any sub-human were to evolve. So there's a billionth of a probability for that to ensue in a unmarried cellular. The human body is made from trillions upon trillions of cells. So each body of those cells ought to ought to mutate by ability of the years to type what we are now. Plus if even one project went incorrect lets be fully ineffective. it really is insanity to even trust that lets evolve from any decrease life type than we are now. Even Darwin himself says if there is now fossil heritage to coach that we developed his concept is inaccurate. Has there been a fossil heritage as a lot as on the present time to coach that we developed? No. There hasn't so there remains no evidence that people ever developed. Why does everybody trust people even developed? i'm no longer some massive creationism recommend yet there is not any reason people had to evolve. Does all of us question if a fowl replaced right into a fowl a million years in the past? everybody in basic terms blindly believes they were. There are one thousand billion issues that ought to flow incorrect in a unmarried cellular to evolve. Plus ingredient what percentage cells ought to ought to adapt it really is mathematically no longer possible. maximum everybody is committing to organic probability. it really is in basic terms stupidity. If the earth replaced into even a inch closer or an inch added faraway from the sunlight than it really is as we talk no life ought to stay in the global. If even one inch out of the trillions of inches that it takes to get to the sunlight counts. Why does no longer one off the trillion cells count number? i'm performed attempting to coach why we did not evolve from apes. i ought to write a e book on motives why we did not. i'm no longer attempting to assert what i trust is ideal all i'm attempting to assert is do no longer stick to so blindly what different persons imagine.

Answer 4

i think that statement is wrong. humans and monkeys evolved from a common ancestor

Answer 5

I think that you have to study more. You are not entirely wrong, but you still lack a grasp on all of the details.

Answer 6

I think women now have to explain where they come from.

Answer 7

I think both have a common ancestor.

Answer 8

The funny thing is, my books on evolution don't mention that. Can you please tell me your source?

Answer 9

I don't believe in that theory.

Answer 10

Hi!

lol thats funny. I dont believe that the word "men" comes from monkey.

Here is the definition and orgin:

men |men| plural form of man . man |man| noun ( pl. men |men|) 1 an adult human male. • a male worker or employee : more than 700 men were laid off | CNN's man in India. • a male member of a sports team : Johnson took the ball past three men and scored. • ( men) ordinary members of the armed forces as distinct from the officers : he had a platoon of forty men to prepare for battle. • a husband, boyfriend, or lover : the two of them lived for a time as man and wife. • [with adj. ] a male person associated with a particular place, activity, or occupation : a Harvard man | I'm a solid union man. • a male pursued or sought by another, esp. in connection with a crime : Inspector Bull was sure they would find their man. • dated a manservant or valet : get me a cocktail, my man. • historical a vassal. 2 a human being of either sex; a person : God cares for all races and all men. • (also Man) [in sing. ] human beings in general; the human race : places untouched by the ravages of man. • [in sing. ] an individual; one : a man could buy a lot with eighteen million dollars. • a person with the qualities often associated with males such as bravery, spirit, or toughness : she was more of a man than any of them. • [in sing. ] [with adj. ] a type of prehistoric human named after the place where the remains were found : Cro-Magnon man. 3 (usu. the Man) informal a group or person in a position of authority over others, such as a corporate employer or the police : it was a vicarious way of powerless people being able to stick it to the Man. • black slang white people collectively regarded as the controlling group in society : he urged that black college athletes boycott the Man's Rose Bowl. 4 a figure or token used in playing a board game. verb ( manned , manning ) [ trans. ] 1 (often be manned) provide (something, esp. a place or machine) with the personnel to run, operate, or defend it : the firemen manned the pumps and fought the blaze. • provide someone to fill (a post or office) : the chaplaincy was formerly manned by the cathedral. 2 archaic fortify the spirits or courage of : he manned himself with dauntless air. exclamation informal used, irrespective of the sex of the person addressed, to express surprise, admiration, delight, etc., or for emphasis : man, what a show! PHRASES as —— as the next man as —— as the average person : I'm as ambitious as the next man. as one man with everyone acting together or in agreement : the crowd rose to their feet as one man. be someone's man be the person perfectly suited to a particular requirement or task : for any coloring and perming services, David's your man. be man enough for (or to do) be brave enough to do : who's man enough for the job? | he has not been man enough to face up to his responsibilities. every man for himself proverb everyone should (or does) look after their own interests rather than considering those of others : when the bottom drops out of the market, it's every man for himself. make a man out of someone (of an experience or person) turn a young man into a mature adult : I make men out of them and teach them never to let anyone outsmart them. man about town a fashionable male socialite. man and boy dated throughout life from youth : the time when families worked in the fields man and boy. the man in the moon the imagined likeness of a face seen on the surface of a full moon.
• figurative used, esp. in comparisons, to refer to someone regarded as out of touch with real life : a kid with no more idea of what to do than the man in the moon. the man in (or on) the street an ordinary person, often with regard to their opinions, or as distinct from an expert : it will be interesting to hear what the man in the street has to say about these latest tax cuts. man of action see action . man of the cloth a clergyman. man of God a clergyman.
• a holy man or saint. man of honor a man who adheres to what is right or to a high standard of conduct. man of the house the male head of a household. man of letters a male scholar or author. man of the moment a man of importance at a particular time. man of the world see world . man's best friend an affectionate or approving way of referring to the dog. a man's man a man whose personality is such that he is as popular and at ease, or more so, with other men than with women. man to man (or man-to-man) 1 in a direct and frank way between two men; openly and honestly : he was able to talk man to man with the delegates | a man-to-man chat. 2 denoting a defensive tactic in a sport such as football or basketball in which each player is responsible for defending against one opponent : Washington's cornerbacks are fast enough to cover man-to-man. men in white coats humorous psychiatrists or psychiatric workers (used to imply that someone is mad or mentally unbalanced) : I wondered how much more stupid I could get before the men in white coats would lead me away. separate (or sort out) the men from the boys informal show or prove which people in a group are truly competent, brave, or mature. to a man without exception : to a man, we have all taken a keen interest in the business.

DERIVATIVES manless adjective ORIGIN Old English man(n), (plural) menn (noun), mannian (verb), of Germanic origin; related to Dutch man, German Mann, and Sanskrit manu ‘mankind.’ USAGE Traditionally, the word man has been used to refer not only to adult males but also to human beings in general, regardless of sex. There is a historical explanation for this: in Old English, the principal sense of man was ‘a human being,’ and the words wer and wif were used to refer specifically to ‘a male person’ and ‘a female person,’ respectively. Subsequently, man replaced wer as the normal term for ‘a male person,’ but at the same time the older sense ‘a human being’ remained in use. In the second half of the 20th century, the generic use of man to refer to ‘human beings in general’ (: reptiles were here long before man appeared on the earth) became problematic; the use is now often regarded as sexist or old-fashioned. In some contexts, terms such as the human race or humankind may be used instead of man or mankind. However, in other cases, particularly in compound forms, alternatives have not yet become established: there are no standard accepted alternatives for manpower or the verb man, for example.

I hope I helped! hehe

Elsie ;)