2007-04-11 23:13:29 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
Yes only If Yuvraj singh is also accompanied him
2007-04-15 08:54:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 13⤊ 0⤋
No Dravid should not retire. He's the only consistent player in current situation. Though Sourav has made a great come back someone like Dravid who can bat at any number is needed. Out of 65 ODI's India has won 33 which is half. It'll be a great loss 4 Indian cricket if Dravid retires. Some more oppurtunities should be given 2 him because he has paved the way 4 India's success many times. All he needs to do is 2 be aggressive in the field n surely India'll succeed.
2007-04-11 23:31:52 · answer #2 · answered by sweety 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why should he ? because he didnt make india go into Semi and win the World Cup ? Last time India didnt win the world cup, did Ganguly retired from cricket ? I think he didnt. Then why should Dravid. Rahul Dravid is playing his best cricket from past 4 years and he has a great going for almost 3 more years and may be he can play the next world cup. I say Dravid is having more future and he is scoring runs and catching balls and thats what we need from a player and he is the best and he can change the game from one point to another point. I saw we have to see more of Dravid until he says " Its over now" So till then....
2007-04-11 23:57:33 · answer #3 · answered by Rizwan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dravid was is & will be a good player.even in the world cup his performance was very good.a teacher teaches all the students in the class.some study well,but some don't.but at times when many students fail the teacher shouts even at the students who have secured a lot of marks instead of praising them.the same is the case of rahul dravid.even though he gave his best performance,he is being blamed for the team's performance instead of being praised for his performance.Sachin played very badly as compared to dravid.when sachin is not ready to retire,why should dravid retire?dravid should not retire
2007-04-11 23:50:50 · answer #4 · answered by vidya madhavan iyengar 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Irrespective of India's pathetic performance in World Cup, I dont think that Dravid should retire as he still looks good for couple of years more.
2007-04-12 09:14:49 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no Dravid should not retire because he is a very good player and Mr. consistent of Indian team. He should be the part of Indian team. He is one of the best players of world.
2007-04-12 18:58:31 · answer #6 · answered by adeel_ash786 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he can stay for 1 to 2 years. But he should retire.
2007-04-11 23:20:09 · answer #7 · answered by lax 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dravid is the only player who can balance out seniors and new kids,let him be there for 2yrs till an youngster takes over!
2007-04-11 23:40:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He should not retire now. He is a consistent player in the Indian team and Indian team needs him.
2007-04-11 23:38:58 · answer #9 · answered by rkd 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who should retire?, lets all retire from speaking about cricket players, they play or dont play, doesnt matter to them, they have made enough from our centiments. we cannot bet on our indian team, they are not constant in their performances.
common lets all take care of our life and studies and business. good luck , be a winner , not make others a winner, by our craziness.
2007-04-12 00:04:18 · answer #10 · answered by lusifus_31 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From ODI's and 20 20. Its a young man's game now
2007-04-11 23:23:21 · answer #11 · answered by Rej 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋