English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Find the determinant of the nxn matrix with 2's on the diagonal, 1's above the diagonal, and 0's below the diagonal.

2007-04-11 15:50:03 · 6 answers · asked by ♡♥EM♡♥ 4 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

6 answers

Hi,

|.2..1.|
|.0..2.|

This gives (2)(2) - (1)(0) = 4 - 0 = 4

I hope this helps!! :-)

2007-04-11 15:55:17 · answer #1 · answered by Pi R Squared 7 · 0 1

properly, one thank you to teach that's to teach the column vectors are actually not linearly autonomous. If we strengthen them out: | a² a²+2a+a million a²+4a+4 a²+6a+9 | | b² b²+2b+a million b²+4b+4 b²+6b+9 | | c² c²+2c+a million b²+4c+4 b²+6c+9 | | d² d²+2nd+a million d²+4d+4 d²+6d+9 | If we are able to make some non-0 linear mix of {a², a²+2a+a million, a²+4a+4, a²+6a+9} to be identically 0 for any integer a, then we've stumbled on a linear mixture that proves the column vectors are actually not linearly autonomous, and subsequently, the determinant could equivalent 0 for all a, b, c, and d. assume there exists p, q, r, s, such that: pa² + q(a²+2a+a million) + r(a²+4a+4) + s(a²+6a+9) = 0 for all a. Then: (p + q + r + s)a² + (2q + 4r + 6s)a + (q + 4r + 9s) = 0 If we are able to discover values of p, q, r, and s such that the above is authentic, then we've our linear mixture. p + q + r + s = 0 2q + 4r + 6s = 0 q + 4r + 9s = 0 This has non-0 thoughts, as a results of fact that's an equation of much less equations than unknowns. The rank of the coefficient matrix is at maximum 3, and so the nullity must be a minimum of a million. subsequently, there exist non-0 p, q, r, s such that: pa² + q(a²+2a+a million) + r(a²+4a+4) + s(a²+6a+9) = 0 for all a, and subsequently, p, q, r, s grant coefficients for a linear mix of the column vectors of the matrix which grant us the 0 vector. subsequently the matrix has 0 determinant.

2016-12-16 03:25:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

2^n. The 1's above the diagonal are multiplied by the zero's.

2007-04-11 15:54:27 · answer #3 · answered by cattbarf 7 · 0 0

The matrix is in lower triangular form and the
determinant of such a matrix is the product
of its diagonal elements. So the answer is 2^n.

2007-04-11 16:07:55 · answer #4 · answered by steiner1745 7 · 0 0

Easy.....2^n.

2007-04-11 15:57:41 · answer #5 · answered by dalia475 2 · 0 0

It's simple. 2^n.

2007-04-11 16:00:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anis Z 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers