2007-04-11 12:54:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Fortune would be far better. Once you have a fortune at your disposal, you would have freedom. Freedom to have the world at your beck and call. Freedom to enable you to realize your wishes..., may it be the wish to travel, to give, to learn, to experience. Money may not buy happiness, but it gives you the all important freedom not to be restricted by bills, financial commitments etc. Who needs fame? To be known by the world? Why? Look at the hideous, media whore lives people like Angelina Jolie, Madonna, and company live. Who needs fame? Your ARE famous to those who know, love, and appreciate you. Family, friends, lovers, co-workers. Everyone is famous in their own sphere.
2007-04-11 13:02:59 · answer #1 · answered by Connie C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fortune i hate being the center of attention too much. plus fame fades faster then a fortune . especially if you know how to mangae said fortune.
2007-04-11 19:58:31 · answer #2 · answered by ~*~AmethystMoonBeams~*~ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fortune if you then wanted fame you could pull a Paris Hilton and just make yourself famous
2007-04-11 20:52:23 · answer #3 · answered by Jana 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fortune- the money is more useful than fame....
2007-04-11 19:57:40 · answer #4 · answered by from HJ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fortune. My ego is to healthy to need fame and it would be cumbersome to not be able to become invisible. Fortune is something you can always use.
2007-04-11 20:00:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
fortune
2007-04-11 20:06:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
fortune
2007-04-11 19:59:50 · answer #7 · answered by Bee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll take fortune anytime.
2007-04-11 22:04:37 · answer #8 · answered by diannegoodwin@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
fortune would be a lot lot lot better..
2007-04-11 20:03:40 · answer #9 · answered by joy emz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋