Hillary would be much, much worse. She's a bitter, conniving shrew who would revel in emasculating all those around her. She would soon be friendless. You should read how she treated her secret service men. It's appalling.
Yeah, we had a taste of Hillary during Bill's term, and Monica had a taste of Bill during his term. (I hope that is not too risqué for Yahoo! Answers)
2007-04-11 11:31:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think that Hillary would be worse. Bill Clinton did do SOME good. I am willing to admit that.
2007-04-11 11:30:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Johnny Conservative 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't know. Being a Republican I have to admit that the idea of someone with a brain occupying the White House is a bit frightening.
2007-04-11 11:32:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bill wasn't all that bad and there is no telling how Hillary will be until she gets into office.
2007-04-11 11:28:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mandra 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
If you believe in socalism than thats what Hillary brings, but who would be worse I think she would.
2007-04-11 11:32:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
bill wasnt bad at all.......i mean he had some domestic problems, but he was a good guy. hilary would turn this place upside down with tax raises and iraq drafting
2007-04-11 11:34:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mitt Romney would be the worst
2007-04-11 11:28:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bill was pretty good. If she gets elected and she needs his help I am sure she will not hesitate to ask.
2007-04-11 11:29:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Any Republican would be worse than either of them at this point.
2007-04-11 11:28:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Both, they are way too liberal to run a country.
2007-04-11 11:27:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋