2007-04-11 09:46:05 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Trying to Conceive
I'm soooo "sorry" that I spelled surrogate" wrong!!!
2007-04-11 09:52:38 · update #1
Surrogate - only if it was a close friend or family member, else, I would not.
It wouldn't be so bad that you misspelled it if you hadn't been so off the mark. What you wrote wouldn't even be pronounced the same way if it were a word.
2007-04-11 09:48:48 · answer #1 · answered by Joy M 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No I’m sorry I wouldn’t. Not when there are so many children/babies out there that need good loving homes. The only difference with an adopted child is it’s not genetically linked to you.
If you are surrogate mother, the babies parents are suppose to pay for the surrogate mothers medical cost, it depends on the contract. Some might even provide a weekly/monthly allowance. Most require that you have had a successfully pregnancy and have had no miscarriages.
2007-04-11 10:26:02 · answer #2 · answered by Spread Peace and Love 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's a sergent mother? Are you talking about a surrogate mother?
I would not do it, because when you are pregnant, even before the baby is born, you become emotionally attached to the child. It would be very, very, very difficult to just give birth to it and then give it up!!!! I could never do that.
2007-04-11 09:49:43 · answer #3 · answered by purplebinky 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Surrogate mother? No, I am pregnant with my own right now and I can't see doing this for someone else.
There are so many baby's needing to be adopted.
2007-04-11 09:48:58 · answer #4 · answered by ladywildfireok 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would love to do that! There are so many great people out there that can't have children who really deserve to have one without having to adopt one. I love the idea of adoption but it's just not the same as your biological child.
I don't smoke or do drugs. I occasionally drink but I wouldn't if I was pregnant.
I'm not the fittest person but my only health problem is I have migraines and I'm a student so no money for pregnant clothing and all the medical bills and extra food craving I'd be having.
2007-04-11 09:52:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm...I wouldn't right now, because I'm a student and it wouldn't be practical. If I were in better health and had the time, I think I would. But only for a couple that I felt would be good parents.
2007-04-11 09:50:36 · answer #6 · answered by kacey 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me Personally no, but only because I have some weird attachement issue. I have three dogs bc I can not drive by a stray with out picking it up.....babies would be much much worse.
2007-04-11 09:49:56 · answer #7 · answered by liese513 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think you mean "surrogate" Mother.
2007-04-11 09:49:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
depends actually on the people....if i know them really well and am really good friends with them but if i didnt 'know them it would be hard to part with the baby...and i probably wouldnt 'do it anyway for strangers
2007-04-11 09:50:06 · answer #9 · answered by Gillespie's Helo Girl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
surrogate
2007-04-11 09:49:20 · answer #10 · answered by me 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋