English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Isn't it better to have a proven enemy as President, ramming openly our fascistic future, rather than the smiling Republicans, who do it with God's blessing?
.

2007-04-11 09:02:14 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

I'm not sure either of those choices would be good for the country...do I get a third choice???

2007-04-11 09:12:08 · answer #1 · answered by foxfire 3 · 4 0

Never. It matters not if she is a witch, only that she is a Socialist, and doesn't believe in the Republic we are. She wants full, complete power of a free society. Socialists, Communists, and Liberals (all the same party), have no place in America. She is the female version of Hitler. National ID cards, Universal health-care, welfare programs, and higher taxes, on Americans, is what she wants, along with backing down to terrorists. I can't live happily with a president who's main goal is to tear Freedom, choice, and the rights of Americans apart. I pray she rots in her own idealism, and stupidity, that WE THE PEOPLE are so ignorant, that we don't know what she is, or have the knowledge to know when someone, like her, is on a power-trip, and out to demolish all America ever stood for, Freedom. I hate her guts, for hating this country, and wanting to deny US ALL of the Liberties our forefather's fought, suffered, struggled and even died for! She is the most UN-American person alive today. I hope people can see what she is, and her plans for us. I beg the people of the USA, to see her for what she truly is. How can any American, allow this woman to become the President of a free Nation, when she wants to take our freedoms away? I pray they won't.

2007-04-11 16:20:26 · answer #2 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1 0

I will vote for her in the Democratic primary as mainly a vote against Obama who I detest. Then, it would depend on whom the Republicans run whether I would vote for her in the general election or not. I'm in favor of Rudy Giuliani, so if he runs against Hillary, Rudy has my vote.

2007-04-11 16:07:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Not exactly. I'd vote for her if she were a more powerful witch. As it is, she can only command her army of winged monkeys to fly from her castle lair and annoy girls in ruby slippers. We need an even more devious and arrogant witch like Endora, Samantha's mother on "Bewitched".

"What's that Iran? You want nukes? OK, wait a moment and I'll give you nukes. One-two-three.....kaboom!!!"

2007-04-11 16:12:51 · answer #4 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 4 0

IF Hillary Rodham was running as the divorced Senator from New York, yes. If she had enough integrity and balls to divorce the numerous counts of adulterous affairs her husband was involved in who is attached to her by the hip?WJC, yes. Because she has neither that I feel a President requires(not testicles) and a ball & chain around her neck to drag all of us down HELL NO!

2007-04-11 16:10:19 · answer #5 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 3 1

I would rather die than vote for that Marxist blimp.
Your point is taken on the republican side, but there you at least have SOME CHANCE of an originalist SJC pick, your taxes lowered, and your border scure. Good luck getting that from Comrade Hilary.

2007-04-11 16:08:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I can't vote for her because she needs to stay in New York. As soon as she became senator, no New York team has won a professional national title.

2007-04-11 16:21:27 · answer #7 · answered by freemanbac 5 · 0 0

Has Hillary had Congress with Satan?

I figure Hillary could not be any worse than what we have. That is the problem with our presidential candidates lately. We are always picking the lesser of two evils rather than a person we can fully support.

2007-04-11 16:10:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

It's too scary to think what she might do if she becomes President. I do think women are capable of being President, but I don't think THIS woman is capable of being President. Too much baggage.

2007-04-11 16:31:13 · answer #9 · answered by theowlposse 2 · 1 0

I think it would be better to not have a Bush or Clinton as President again.

2007-04-11 16:11:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers