2007-04-11 08:44:21 · 6 answers · asked by Whatup??? 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Do you people have down syndrone or what? I in no way compared Ronald Reagan to Jesus. There is a difference between comparison an a historical reference to time...get with the program people.
2007-04-11 09:05:18 · update #1
FYI mistress Jesus came after Moses....if you can't keep up with the conversation maybe you should sit in the corner!
2007-04-11 09:06:37 · update #2
So Regan was greater than Moses, Da Vinci, Shakespeare, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Winston Churchill, Theodore Roosevelt, Gandhi, etc., etc.
I think history is thumbing its nose at you.
2007-04-11 08:52:37 · answer #1 · answered by mistress_piper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is scary ... I might agree that Reagan has the least amount of negatives of any president since Eisenhower, and maybe before that, however, to compare him to Jesus is a bit of a stretch. I mean, the last president they did that to was FDR and he had his 'issues' (court packing, etc.)
2007-04-11 15:49:36 · answer #2 · answered by John B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, right! And Hitler was a puddy tat. And, on top of it all, Bonzo couldn't even act.
This whole line is an insult to Jesus Christ.
2007-04-11 15:53:11 · answer #3 · answered by Seriously? 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no no its jimmy carter and now history agrees but even i have to say that none compare close to Jesus or any of gods people
2007-04-11 15:56:39 · answer #4 · answered by jojo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reagen's bigger than the Beatles YAY!!
No one gets this reference, hurray!
2007-04-11 15:50:36 · answer #5 · answered by 29 characters to work with...... 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
iiiiinteresting.. which history book did you get that one from?
2007-04-11 16:20:19 · answer #6 · answered by bob j 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋