Did he contribute positively or negatively to society?
2007-04-11 06:35:19 · 6 answers · asked by MNL 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Positive. Because he was a revolutionary who was a great fighter, AND he refused to be a politician (as opposed to Castro.)
Negative. Because he paved the way for Castro.
2007-04-11 06:43:06 · answer #1 · answered by hey_finny 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A higher-profile thug. Thugs contribute negatively to society in general.
2007-04-11 06:43:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Guevara was a revolutionary who started out with good intentions, but as usually happens -became powerful and let the power go to his head. He then became a ruthless thug, killing all who disagreed with him. Eventually he was executed.
2007-04-11 07:02:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was a brilliant tactician. If you read at all about how he and Castro usurped the Battista regime, it was very well executed (no pun intended).
Outside of that, he was just another communist rebel. That would be a "positive" for communist sympathizers and a "negative" for those who are against communism, I suppose.
2007-04-11 06:39:21 · answer #4 · answered by wizbangs 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just another opportunistic outcast who found a home in the Cuban Revolution.
2007-04-11 06:46:08 · answer #5 · answered by snvffy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he simply helped in the communist revolution against the diktator of his time
2007-04-11 06:38:51 · answer #6 · answered by cuffmugger 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋