about the fact that scientists can barely predict the next hurricane season let alone todays weather report? they said this year was supposed to be the worst hurricane season ever and it wasnt/ They made false predictions about where it would be hot and cold etc. this year and were wrong like they usually are.
How dare they have the audacity to claim they have predicted the fate of the climate 100 years from now to the point where there is "no debate" as Al Gore would put it. Al Gore is just trying to shut down debaet like always when there are thousands upon thousands of scientists who are in very high places who dont beleive this is a cause for such alarm.
2007-04-11 05:15:28 · 19 answers · asked by libh8r13f 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
"You are talking about the same people who claimed the universe just appeared and that humans evolved from Monkeys. "
- Your lack fo science is amazing, we did not come from monkeys, evolution teaches we had a common ancestor but we in NO way came from monkeys you see today. Also, very few scientists believe that the big bang came from nowhere, ever heard of the multiverse theory? Get an education.
2007-04-11 05:21:32 · update #1
"Dur fox news sayd that globul warmin is a farce and I beliv dem becuz they dun like dem libruls. "
-Im conservative and I dont even watch fox news or any TV, try again.
2007-04-11 05:22:06 · update #2
.
"the debates been going for 30 yrs "
Lol, 30 years ago the same scientists were claiming that there is global cooling adn that we would eb in an ice age within 50 years. You see any ice ages coming in the next 20 years? Moron.
How come because I beleive something against the grain I suddenly "only get my info from Fox news", lol I dont even watch TV.
2007-04-11 05:23:38 · update #3
TELL IT BROTHER!!! global warming is a political construction aimed at making money from useless taxation and pointless policies. if you will look you will notice that the biggest pushers of the whole thing stand to profit from all the new "green" products they plan to market.
2007-04-11 05:22:29 · answer #1 · answered by cwfraggle 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Your lack of understanding amazes me. You're saying that the carbon dioxide humans have released into the atmosphere has no effect on the environment. You're insulting every person who has worked towards making alternative fuel to power countries and prevent the climate from a total downfall. You say that thousands of scientists don't believe this is cause for such alarm. You should listen to the other millions who think otherwise. I think someone like Al Gore would have more understanding of this particular subject having been studying it half of his life than someone like yourself.
2007-04-11 05:35:19 · answer #2 · answered by kate62393 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
surely? you won't be able to cope with the truth! Lol the earth's climate has warmed before people stepped faraway from residing with the ecosystem (except the community tribes nevertheless education that lifestyle, truly contained in the amazon) and inspite of if all of humanity in no way existed, the elements ought to nevertheless warmth. it really is element of a organic cycle of earth, notwithstanding as to how a lot people can impression this cycles velocity is all of us guess and that i'm keen to make certain out climate administration, as sometime humanity will locate the truth our earth will lower back warmth up and placed our species success to an astonishing try of survival. all of us want to eat and agriculture is the biggest sufferer in warming climate, the flowon result's definitely global starvation. it really is agriculture that needs saving for the survival humanity! I doubt the worlds human inhabitants will ever stablise and if we in no way colonize yet another planet in sn attempt to maintain more effective elements to keep up our inhabitants, then perhaps we can in no way locate the numerous advantages the universe holds in keep for our species.
2016-12-03 20:33:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
whatever, thousands upon thousands of scientists in very high places? name 1 or 2.
let's say Al Gore never came to planet Earth and you never heard of him.
do you deny the fact that the climate is changing? regardless what the causes, the scientific fact is that the earth is a changing planet. its straight up geology.
do you also refuse to believe the polar caps are melting?
these facts are not debatable. maybe the causes and man's role in global warming is debatable. put you can't choose to not believe in scientific findings.
2007-04-11 05:26:28 · answer #4 · answered by Diggy 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that is definately true (considering it was supposed to be 70 and sunny in my town today and it is raining right now) but i still think that global warming is an issue and the fact that it has been brought up can only help the planet, you know? what harm can come from knowledge of a potentially harmful issue? awareness? positive changes in behavior that can benefit not only yourself but the world? motivation to do something to help out? i think that even if it turns out that global warming "isn't a big deal", the world will change for the better because we will have curbed unnecessary energy use, found earth-friendly resources, and helped at least a few people waste less. it's a win-win in my book!
2007-04-11 05:24:27 · answer #5 · answered by thunderwear 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I have tried to jerk it to that movie, but I can't get off.
Why does it bother you? Why shouldn't we do things now, small or large, to better the future? I don't see the problem in owning a car that gets good gas mileage, and conserving water and recycling. I don't understand why this is hard?
Anyone who thinks that evolution is wrong, and that we came from Adam and Eve, is far more alarming than someone who believes in global warming.
2007-04-11 05:27:48 · answer #6 · answered by Theresa M 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Global warming may not produce expected results in any given season or year, but we must be concerned about its overall long-term effects. Metereoligists make their predictions based on what fronts they see are on the point of colliding. Sometimes those fronts move off in unpredictable directions, but usually they get it right.
2007-04-11 05:34:15 · answer #7 · answered by obelix 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The global warming bit runs on the idea that increased CO2 output(which they attribute to humans) is causing higher temperatures. They have pretty graphs that chart CO2 levels versus global temperature averages, and apparently there does seem to be correlation.
The only thing still unproven but implied as infallible Truth is the idea that humans are responsible for the majority of the CO2.
Slinging names at people gets you nowhere; cite facts in your arguments or go home.
2007-04-11 05:22:16 · answer #8 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'll be glad to see you down on your knees in ten years regretting your words today, and cursing the day you first learned how to drive. The believers and the dis-believers will certainly one day have an altercation. Hopefully it will be in one large format.
2007-04-11 05:32:01 · answer #9 · answered by warning 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the debates been going for 30 yrs why do you now all of a sudden wish to involve yourself in it? Do you have research or new information to share with us? no, didn't think so. what part of the mid west is it that you come from?
2007-04-11 05:20:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Dur fox news sayd that globul warmin is a farce and I beliv dem becuz they dun like dem libruls.
2007-04-11 05:19:45 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋