NO WMD's
2007-04-11 05:07:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes.
Those who deny this think that only SS-20s with nuclear warheads are wmd.
The sites below describe chemical weapons found in Iraq.
Addition: Interesting, that somebody thinks that reports of chemical weapons deserve a thumbs down. I wear that thumbs down as a badge of honor!
2007-04-11 12:06:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
na, because saddam used em all......
that we didn´t know.... we knew he had some WMD´s because we have the reciept..... we sold him the freaking weapons....
then, he used em on his own people.... so, no we did not find any WMD´s in iraq.....
maybe if we would have invaded 10 years ago we would´ve found them.....
or... maybe if we never would have sold them to him in the first place, he wouldn´t have been able to use what he didn´t have and we might not be there now.... to clean up the mess of some past presidency... why making an even bigger mess for some later presidency.....
2007-04-11 12:15:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by James R 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes, and multiple instances of correspondence with his allies showed that he claimed to have them right up to days of the invasion. During that time he bragged that he was making fools of the U.N. and the U.S.A. to his friends and associates while he was lying to them, distracting them, and kicking them out every other month.
Not exactly what he had agreed to in the cease-fire.
So, realizing he had ended the cease-fire long ago by continuing to shoot at our planes, trying to assassinate one of our Presidents, paying terrorists to attack our allies (Israel), and that he was continuing to murder any dissident he even suspected, we ended him.
Amazing that some people think we should allow other countries to do that to us.
2007-04-11 18:50:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
1⤊
0⤋