He sucks so bad at his job....he could suck a 100 pound watermelon through a 100 foot garden hose!
2007-04-11 04:16:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
First of all, he is not "our" president because we didn't elect him - both elections were rigged by electronic ballot fraud. There is overwhelming proof of this documented by numerous sources.
As far as what kind of job he is doing, I would say he is a success as a megalominiacal dictator and wannabe king. He has succeeded in usurping most of the power from Congress and the Supreme Court and gotten away with lying and decieving his way into two foriegn wars with disastrous outcomes. If he gets his way, which I'm sure he will, we will be enmeshed in a far more dangerous war with Iran which would have far worse consequences for us all, especially if Iran already has nuclear weapons.
In short, he is the worst president this world has ever seen, even worse than Nixon, and that says a lot about the man. Oh, and he is an ignorant moron and the stupidest president we've ever had in office.
2007-04-11 04:56:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jonathon M 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
He is by far the worst President in history. Some Presidents didn't have to contend with much, but sometimes success can be measured by what a President doesn't do even though he can.
Under his presidency foreign policy was largely dormant for six months and after 9/11, when the world rallied behind the United States and put aside their differences with us and their contempt over some of our policies, President Bush eventually squandered it all with an unnecessary unilateral war of choice in Iraq which divided our allies, united our enemies and created a tremendous opportunity for those who wish us ill to have a platform of legitimacy for their anti American diatribe. It's significantly weakened our soft power, and all but destroyed our global position. Nearly two million Iraqi's have left the country because conditions there are so bad, nearly another million Iraqi's have been displaced and are internal refugees, and due to the mortality rate five hundred thousand people who would have been born were not born or died earlier than they would have, not to mention the nearly sixty thousand people killed as a result of our direct military action, all this as a result of our so called "liberation". A country that rallied the free world against the Soviet Union during the Cuban missile crisis, and mounted an impressive military coalition against Iraq after its invasion of Kuwait, was forced to mount serious diplomatic efforts and give economic packages to countries for offering the smallest, most symbolic assistance for Iraq: some countries only sent bomb sniffing monkeys, or have only five troops fighting in Iraq.
He has blanketed the mindsets of Americans with factually incorrect dogma about the terrorists and how we can defeat them. He believes, very foolishly, that the attacks against us represented an unstoppable, nihilistic rage towards America because of peoples perverted misinterpretation of an ancient article of faith, and not because of specific historical occurrences or actual political grievances, and that their minds can be changed by simply bombing them to a point where they suddenly go from hating us to loving us. He doesn't understand that America can't act like an empire in the post imperial age, and that democracy comes from a long and slow and painful process that starts internally, not externally forced upon by a power with profound cultural, ethnic, linguistic, and religious differences. He also refuses to see that if America continues to stay in Iraq it will bring about much more and harsher anti Americanism, to the point that our allies in Europe and East Asia will no longer be able to afford to gives us overt political support for any international issue in the future, and that mid east elites who control oil, a resource we vitally need, will be forced to quietly solicit protection from rising powers in China and India having been forced to severe ties with America.
2007-04-11 04:25:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by billy d 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Wow yall need to shut the hell up or get the hell out, its not like you could do any better. Yeah why don't you try to be the president when 9/11 happens or any of the other stuff hes had to deal with happens, so shut the f*** up.
2007-04-11 10:11:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by doitbig81 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
no worse than say... jimmy carter did.. or bill clinton..
remember clinton only had 2 years before he lost everything to the GOP which pretty much stopped everything he did..
no matter who the pres. is..
40% of the nation will like him
40% will hate him
20% wont really care...
it is less than 50% of America that votes anyway..
by the way worse pres in history goes to jimmy carter.. with his 10% unemployement rate and the 100 american hostage he did nothing about... when he ran the country america was bi%ch slapped all over tha place and he didnt do anything about it
2007-04-11 04:44:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Larry M 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
He should be wearing a headset over at McD's. Looking at the pictures of Big Mac's on the register.
2007-04-11 04:18:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Whoa_Phat 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Buys a beer for all the folks who can see what a right **** bush is and begs everyone to vote (who knows it might work)
2007-04-11 04:38:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by contrary mary 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
You need someone to tell you what a lousy job he is doing and has done for six years?
Don't you already know the answer.
2007-04-11 04:17:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by p00756 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm so disgusted with Bush and his party, I really don't want to talk about it. I'd just be reiterating what the media has been saying, so I'll keep this short.
2007-04-11 04:04:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
no terrorist attacks since 9/11
unemployment at all time low
economy booming
tax cuts
all this in spite of dealing with a bunch of egotistical,selfserving, money grabbing politicans that care nothing about the country or you and i.
2007-04-11 04:17:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by snitchel 2
·
1⤊
2⤋