...to leave the occupied territories?
2007-04-11 02:35:18 · 8 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
G.W. Bush values the saftey of himself and so he does what is best for himself, not Israel.
Also the US has been working on peace plans for the occupied territories for a long time and quietly advising this sort of strategy but also avoiding antagonising the Jewish lobby in the states.
2007-04-11 02:43:05 · answer #1 · answered by flingebunt 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bush has no say so over the occupied territories and what Israel decides to do, contrary to popular belief. Israel dictates it's own policy and right now, as has always been the policy, is to confiscate more and more Palestinian land via the building of the wall and destruction of Palestinian homes and farms for immigrant Israeli settlers. The intention is to make life so difficult for the Palestinians that they will be forced to leave for the sake of their lives and families. Those who remain steadfast and refuse to leave Palestine are subject to daily harassment, humiliation, uncalled for jailing and even death. As Ariel Sharon put it when being interviewed on Israeli radio, "Don't worry about America, we control America and they know it."
2007-04-11 09:48:31 · answer #2 · answered by one voice 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You can't be serious.
You're one of those people who think that all of the strife in the Middle East is being caused by a bum real estate deal, aren't you? That of all of the land in the entire Mid-East, it's this little, tiny, Idaho-sized country that JUST SO HAPPENS to be primarily made up of a religion that the whole Mid-East is bred to hate, that is causing all of these problems? That in the 14 centuries of Islam, all of their uprising and anger is caused by a 70 year old land deal?
And where would you like them to go Captain Solutions? You think they'll get the opportunity to look for land somewhere else in the Middle East?
Seriously....read something beyond one-sided weblogs and get real with yourself.
2007-04-11 09:56:01 · answer #3 · answered by jdm 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Argumentum ad logicam
2007-04-11 09:38:45 · answer #4 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes but Israel wont leave they have no intention and although america has alot of influence over israel, it is still israel who do as they please because the raise the whole history case.
Israel should leave but they wont unfortunately
2007-04-11 09:38:23 · answer #5 · answered by Fadwa 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hah! Of course, but when was the last time Bush did anything for anybody that was based on what's right? (as opposed to someone lining someone's pockets with $$$).
2007-04-11 09:39:33 · answer #6 · answered by JeffyB 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Okey doke. Then Kosovo can't have it's independence because it rightfully belongs to the Serbians.
2007-04-11 09:40:29 · answer #7 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
would you take the advice of the french to leave the lands we occupy from the indians?...i think not...
2007-04-11 09:39:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋