English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know we will still THINK we are the world leaders, but Bush has so seriously diminished our position in the world that we will now be ignored.

Example; John Bolton remains a Foreign Policy adviser to Bush, now is there a less trusted American on the world stage?

2007-04-11 00:37:25 · 8 answers · asked by Blessed 1 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Bolton and the Waver Codolezza Rice are surely duds. America will just replace them and have to start over when Bush gets impeached. Pelosi is already working on the peace Bush ignores.

2007-04-11 00:53:29 · answer #1 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 2 0

Well in my opinion I trust Paul Wolfowitz the least. But I get your point.

We are no longer the protector that we were viewed to be for so long. From the moment we invaded a sovereign nation, we became an aggressive warlike country. And not by the citizens choice. It came from a tyrannical leader that has dragged Americas name and reputation through the mud.

We've got real problems right now in this country. And until the rest of the Bush cheerleaders wake up and stop drinking the government kool-aid, it is only going to get worse.

Edit: Arwen, unfortunately us "liberals" can only speak. I can bet you though, that the moment a law is passed that allows the average citizen to introduce articles of impeachment to the congress and house, you don't see your precious liar in office anymore. God forbid you use logic before you post. I know that isn't a neo-con trait. People blaming things on Bush is no different then any neo-con retard blaming everything on Clinton. You should really do some reading before speaking.

2007-04-11 00:42:59 · answer #2 · answered by trevor22in 4 · 4 1

It is difficult to understand the Bush administration policy of not taking the lead in supporting peace talks between Isarael and Palestinian leaders. I do think the next President will begin, again, diplomacy around the world in certain important "hot spots".

2007-04-11 00:43:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

A mediator must not be biased in the resolution of disputes but not to be interested in the outcome of the case just like the Americans who wanted to get benefits from any act where it is involved.

2007-04-11 00:41:42 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 5 0

What ever gave you the impression we were any good at international mediation in the first place? You can't diminish what never existed in the first place.

Clinton mediated his butt off when he wasn't messing with Monica. What did he accomplish? Are Israel and Palistine friends? Every thing he mediated didn't change but he got a lot of publicity.

2007-04-11 00:48:40 · answer #5 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0 3

Yes. We can't be trusted because our President's brain has been out to lunch since the early 70s. (College cheerleading.)

2007-04-11 00:44:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

George Washington warned in his farewell address...Don't get involved in foriegn entanglements and beware of the evils of political parties. Sorry for not listening George, you were right.

2007-04-11 01:00:42 · answer #7 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 0 1

Blame it on Bush! It's all Bush's fault. Bush Bush Bush. Tha's the only excuse you liberals can come up with. Grow up and do something to fix it if you have a problem.

2007-04-11 00:40:58 · answer #8 · answered by arwenlotr2 3 · 0 10

fedest.com, questions and answers