How come there was no plane wreckage found at the Pentagon?

Answer 1

Only one facet of a multi-faceted incident in need of inspection.

Those in power made dogged decisions without determining the culprits.

I still gather facts, and the end result will be shocking and alarming.

The extent of the damage of 911 was roughly a hundred billion dollars.

The extent of the damage ever since has cost taxpayers over a trillion dollars.

Accountability should be in order now, ya think?

Answer 2

There Was. I am a Jet engine mechanic for the Navy (9 years and still on active duty), i saw multiple pictures of the remnants of the turbines and compressors of the engines. There is also one picture where they took a large portion of the wing main spar (strongest piece of the plane) out of the wreckage. You could see evidence on the spar of melting on the ends and it had turned to metal slag. I've seen a few plane crashes in my time and if you have enough fuel on board and crash into a confined space, where all if the fuel in effect turns into a 3000 degree furnace, there isnt much left. Hope this helps

Answer 3

There was, they documented it.

You are reading the conspiracy sites WAY too much and haven't bothered to read the actual evidence.
That's like reading the tabloid at the store and ignoring a court transcript.

You've already decided your government has lied, then proceeded to ignore all evidence to the contrary because it doesn't fit your belief system.

Me? I've been to the sites in question, and actually read the information on both sides. I encourage people to do so.
(Oh, dear, what do you do with a conspiracy critic who doesn't dismiss your evidence?)

People read the sites that claim this, but DON'T just believe them. Once you see the evidence on both sides, in my opinion you'll see how silly these arguments are.

When a newly steel reinforced concrete building is penetrated by pieces of a plane (and they expect the wings to stay rigid on entry?) to three stories deep (!) and scatters debris for acres due to a deliberate attempt to reach maximum acceleration before impact, you aren't going to find much debris bigger than your head, but you'll find it everywhere.

You've seen major car wrecks. LOOK at those. Can you imagine the speed increased and what happens to a plane when it hits a sollid block of steel and concrete and suddenly decelerates to zero? All that energy goes everywhere along with as much matter as is with it. And planes aren't meant to withstand impact damage. Wings are designed to support in air, not stay stiff and unyeilding. Airplanes are not made to resist punctures, as armor tends to make flying, a bit difficult.

These people think it should have acted like a tank at five miles an hour and bounce off intact, or flown through the Pentagon with wings intact and left an airplane shaped hole, like a Bugs Bunny outline in a wall.

It's getting silly out there. Educate yourself on both sides of the issue. I trust in the reasoning abilities of my fellow citizens (most of them).

And all I need to know we aren't going off the deep end in a representative democratic republic?

Most of them.

Answer 4

The plane was traveling hundreds of miles per hour at impact and there was just a bit of an explosion and fire. There was wreckage, but in bits and pieces hardly large enough to identify.

Answer 5

So everyone who just happened to be driving down I-395 past the Pentagon at that moment was part of a big govt. cover-up?? Um yeah kinda hard to confuse a Tomahawk cruise missle with a 757, sorry.

Answer 6

There was. The conspiratists would have you believe that the Pentagon was hit by a missile and not a plane. They are wrong.

Answer 7

You mean all of this plane wreckage. Why do you lie so much. Are you really that insecure?

Answer 8

Is this Rosie O'Donnelle?