English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What other nations will be invaded and pillaged in search of non-existent WMD?

2007-04-10 17:38:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

US is not qualified or equipped to police the world.

US is a thug invader and mass murderer in Iraq, out of its region, out of its league. US is the worl bull terrorist, engaged exactly in the kinds of things they accuse terrorists. Hundreds of thousands of Muslims are dead because of the US actions worldwide.

Torture, assassinations, detention without representation of SUSPECTS. If the Bush provoked world war is on, the USA is on the wrong side.

2007-04-11 12:11:39 · update #1

Iraq had nothing to do with 911.
No WMD ever found - ever.
Saddam and his sons murdered by Bush in revenge - for 1500 BILLION USD. As you submit your taxes to Officer Sam, ponder was the murder of Saddam Hussein worth it? The correct answer is: "No, it is not."

2007-04-11 12:31:55 · update #2

10 answers

unfortunately the last soldier to die will do so long after Duh-bya is out of office...for those on this question that think this war was such a good idea and are 42 or younger, whether or not you have felonies or an education(the new gold standard for eligibility for admission to the services), I suggest that you grab a weapon and head over to Iraq and do your part or shut the f*** up...

2007-04-10 18:00:30 · answer #1 · answered by jimbo z 1 · 2 0

i have a great idea for you go ask someone in the millitary presently that question and see how hard you get punched in the face for asking such a ignorant question. Get your own brain and stop repeating what other people have said on tv or what youve heard the local hippies at the coffee shop gabbin about. gee lets just sit here and let a country full of suicidal psychotics take over the country and just you know say thank you while all this is happening. is that what you want? if it was not for the millitary youd more than likely be dead right now so would I so would alot of people. all im saying is if you were president which i seriously doubt you will ever be what would you have done? I mean think in reality how big the usa is i mean thats a huge responsibility the guys doin the best he can and seems to be doing a damn good job of it to me.

2007-04-10 17:51:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Many more. This isn't about Iraq. It is about helping Islam realize that they can't survive freedom. Their people know what is possible. They will not tolerate Islamic dictatorships any longer.

Conspiracy theorists LIVE to narrow down events to single causes. They ignore little things like attempted assassinations of Presidents, invasions of our allies (Kuwait), continuous breaking of cease-fires, etc.
It's all because we believed Saddam when he bragged to his allies that he was making a fool of the United States and the U.N. and still had lot's of WMDs and was making more.

Imagine a mad-man shot part of his family, stabbed at his neighbor and threatened to shoot him, was beaten back by the police led by Officer Sam.
The mad-man agrees to live in house arrest and allow a neighborhood watch to check to see if he still has guns.
The mad-man procedes to lie to the watch, keep them distracted, hide things from them, kick them out when they get too close to things, etc. The watch threatens for ten years but does nothing.
Officer Sam finally has enough of a watch with no backbone, notes that the madman has been calling his neighbors bragging about having a gun and being ready to use it and getting more.

Is Officer Sam supposed to stand there and watch for another ten years?

That's an analogy of what they wanted us to do. We are condemned because we believed Saddam when HE claimed he had WMDs right up to before the invasion.

These people want us to give up because THEY SIDE AGAINST THE U.S.!

I've chosen sides in this World War. Have you?

2007-04-11 11:19:29 · answer #3 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1 1

isn't relaxing in a tragic tragic way .. how human beings will take your question and straight away accuse you of attacking the warriors ......are they completely blind as to what that's you have written.... This war is Vietnam yet back ... good squaddies death for a NO good reason... what replace into it back ( re Iraq) .. WMD?? or replace into it forthcoming possibility ??? or replace into it a regime replace?? September11th ( that had no longer something TO DO WITH SADAM) or replace into all of it basically over oil. challenge performed ? how some years later?? My coronary heart is going out to the warriors and their families and no person i understand who's against the war ... Hates the warriors .. all of them have the soldier's perfect interest at coronary heart. maximum of people i understand stay in extra worry of their government that they actually do of a terrorist attack. they are nerve-racking of the rights that they are dropping below the guise of the patriot (sp) act.. they are nerve-racking of the enemies that they've faith their government is springing up.... Sadam replace into NO possibility to the U. S..( no disputing he replace into to particular communities interior of his very own human beings) ... yet what share cases have you ever study human beings writing approximately how lots safer they sense without sadam... enable's basically say SUCKED IN BIGTIME human beings.. maximum of of you're allowing yourselves to stay fearfully . a ploy of your government so as which you would be arranged to do what the presidents asks despite skill to justify HIS end. Having suggested ALL THAT .. troops can no longer purely pull out of Iraq.. we instigated the regime replace ( a regime that DID have stability .. additionally created out ot worry) it could be morally corrupt to pass away the harmless unguarded. Peace Keepers are mandatory. you have requested a question which will rile many up .. there is not any basic answer to this

2016-10-21 14:31:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

none, and none. They are dying fighting to make their country free from the past 5000 years of oppression. America has never invaded or pillaged any other nation, and never will..

2007-04-10 17:45:02 · answer #5 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 1 1

Dude,

Where have you been? WMD's were discovered, as was the infrastructure to create them.

2007-04-10 17:42:13 · answer #6 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 3 1

Why don't you have a really good day and leave the country for good!

2007-04-10 17:42:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Have you registered to vote?

2007-04-10 17:53:45 · answer #8 · answered by towanda 7 · 1 1

NOT ENOUGH! As many as it takes.

2007-04-11 12:35:45 · answer #9 · answered by dumbuster 3 · 0 1

Let me make you aware of some of the people who authorized Bush's actions in Iraq. It seems people forget.


* Gary Ackerman (D-NY 5th)
2. * Rob Andrews (D-NJ 1st)
3. * Jim Barcia (D-MI 5th)
4. * Ken Bentsen (D-TX 25th)
5.* Shelley Berkley (D-NV 1st)
6. * Howard Berman (D-CA 26th)
7. * Marion Berry (D-AR 1st)
8. * Sanford Bishop (D-GA 2nd)
9. * Rod Blagojevich (D-IL 5th)
10. * Bob Borski (D-PA 3rd)
11. * Leonard Boswell (D-IA 3rd)
12. * Richard Boucher (D-VA 9th)
13. * Allen Boyd (D-FL 2nd)
14. * Brad Carson (D-OK 2nd)
15. * Bob Clement (D-TN 5th)
16. * Robert Cramer (D-AL 5th)
17. * Philip Crane (D-IL 8th)
18. * Joseph Crowley (D-NY 7th)
19. * Jim Davis (D-FL 11th)
20. * Peter Deutsch (D-FL 20th)
21. * Norman ***** (D-WA 6th)
22. * Cal Dooley (D-CA 20th)
23. * Chet Edwards (D-TX 11th)
24. * Eliot L. Engel (D-NY 17th)
25. * Bob Etheridge (D-NC 2nd)
26.* Harold Ford (D-TN 9th)
27. * Martin Frost (D-TX 26th)
28. * Dick Gephardt (D-MO 3rd)
29.* Bart Gordon (D-TN 6st)
30. * Gene Green (D-TX 29th)
31. * Jane Harman (D-CA 36th)
32. * Melissa Hart (D-PA 4th)
33. * Baron Hill (D-IN 9th)
34. * Joe Hoeffel (D-PA 4th)
35. * Tim Holden (D-PA 6th)
36. * Steny Hoyer (D-MD 5th)
37. * Steve Israel (D-NY 2nd)
38. * William Jefferson (D-LA 2nd)
39. * Chris John (D-LA 7th)
40. * Paul Kanjorski (D-PA 11th)
41. * Patrick J. Kennedy (D-RI 1st)
42.* Ron Kind (D-WI 3rd)
43. * Nick Lampson (D-TX 11th)
44. * Tom Lantos (D-CA 12th)
45. * Nita Lowey (D-NY 18th)
46. * Ken Lucas (D-KY 4th)
47. * Steve Lynch (D-MA 9th)
48. * Carolyn Maloney (D-NY 14th)
49. * Ed Markey (D-MA 7th)
50. * Frank Mascara (D-PA 20th)
51. * Jim Matheson (D-UT 2nd)
52. * Mike McIntyre (D-NC 7th)
53. * Michael McNulty (D-NY 21th)
54. * Martin T. Meehan (D-MA 5th)
55.* Dennis Moore (D-KS 3rd)
56.* John Murtha (D-PA 12th)
57. * Bill Pascrell(D-NJ 8th)
58.* Collin C. Peterson (D-MN 7th)
59. * Earl Pomeroy (D-ND At large)
60. * Tim Roemer (D-IN 3rd)
61. * Mike Ross (D-AR 4th)
62. * Steve Rothman (D-NJ 9th)
63. * Max Sandlin (D-TX 1st)
64. * Adam Schiff (D-CA 27th)
65.* Brad Sherman (D-CA 24th)
66. * Ronnie Shows (D-MS 4th
67. * Ike Skelton (D-MO 4th)
68. * Adam Smith (D-WA 9th)

69. * John Spratt (D-SC 5th)
70. * Charles Stenholm (D-TX 17th)
71. * John S. Tanner (D-TN 8th)
72. * Ellen Tauscher (D-CA 10th)
73. * Gene Taylor (D-MS 5th)
74. * Karen Thurman (D-FL 5th)
75. * Greg Walden (D-OR 2nd)
76. * Henry Waxman (D-CA 29th)
77. * Anthony D. Weiner (D-NY 9th)
78. * Robert Wexler (D-FL 19th)
79. * Albert Wynn (D-MD 4th)
80.
* Max Baucus (D-MT)
1. * Evan Bayh (D-IN)
2.* Joe Biden (D-DE)
3.* John Breaux (D-LA)
4. * Maria Cantwell (D-WA)
5. * Jean Carnahan (D-MO)
6. * Tom Carper (D-DE)
7. * Max Cleland (D-GA)
8. * Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
9. * Tom Daschle (D-SD)
10.* Christopher Dodd (D-CT)
11.* Byron Dorgan (D-ND)
12. * John Edwards (D-NC)
13. * Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
14.* Tom Harkin (D-IA)
15. * Fritz Hollings (D-SC)
16.* Tim Johnson(D-SD)
17. * John Kerry (D-MA)
18. * Herb Kohl (D-WI)
19. * Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
20. * Joe Lieberman (D-CT)
21. * Blanche Lincoln (D-AR)
22.* Zell Miller (D-GA)
23. * Bill Nelson (D-FL)
24. * Ben Nelson (D-NE)
25.* Harry Reid (D-NV)
26. * Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)
27. ** Chuck Schumer (D-NY)
28.* Robert Torricelli (D-NJ)

2007-04-10 17:42:21 · answer #10 · answered by Barack O Bankrupt 4 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers