Why was the most" heavily defended building" the in the world the pentagon hit on 9/11?

Question

also why was only one camera working in the most "heavily defended building "in the world?one camera with 5 grainy stills? wheres the other cameras? answer this !?!

hey neoCONS answer this!

scarlett i know people from NY who are pissed about the gov withholding info !

OC girl you've been watching too much OC and yes we as a people do have right to know its called FREEDOM OF INFORMATION !

jfkfromma your spam provides nothing!

Answer 1

Nope...it doesn't make any sense.

Interestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with plastic box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, (a man on dialysis hiding in a cave half way around the world) out smarted the CIA, FBI, NSA, FAA, The Pentagon, and our Multi Trillion Dollar High Tech Military by crashing 4 planes without any intervention.

The following is irrefutable:

FACT: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI web site. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care if we catch him or not.

FACT: There are hundreds of televised claims from the morning of the attacks saying that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers. These include firefighters, police, news reporters, security guards, employees of the WTC and civilians.

FACT: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a concrete and steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symmetrically at free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collapse as DEMOLITION. Fire does not have the energy to do this. Besides, Larry Silverstein declared on TV that they “pulled” building 7.

FACT: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence and malpractice in the history of forensics.

FACT: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence.

FACT: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24 A.M, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Shanksville Penn. NORAD has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. The Bush Administration changed their story several times. We must also look at the fact that President Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the morning of the attacks.

FACT: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families and the loss of their loved ones.

FACT: No one has been fired for the failures of 9/11.

FACT: Right before the attack a spike in “put options” on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines increased dramatically and was never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates people knew in advance. Why didn’t the FBI check out these leads?

FACT: In August 6, 2001 A Public Daily Briefing Memo that was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US was brought forward. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and airline workers have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?

FACT: When the United States is under attack the first measure is to secure the President.
The entire nation knew 2 weeks in advance that President Bush would be at Booker Elementary Grade School. Why did his body guards and secret service men let him remain at this location for 20 minutes after the attack? Holding the book “My Pet Goat” upside down while he tried to address a bunch of 5th grade students?

The bottom line is - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Immediately! Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. They feel no one is to blame. This was the conclusion they had prior to the investigation. What the 9/11 Commission produced is the anti-thesis of the scientific method. Much of the evidence was outright omitted. Since they determined the conclusion prematurely. Do you understand?

If you were an underwriter at an insurance company, or an architectural engineer, or a fire marshal, wouldn't you want to know what really happened in these buildings? If you were a pilot, or an FAA employee, wouldn't you want to know which NORAD employee stood down, failed to requisition intervention or just plain messed up that day?

To dismiss the overwhelming evidence that explicitly shows how hundreds of questions remain unanswered suggests a cover-up by our government. Conservative thinking has taught us to keep government in check 100% of the time.

More and more people are joining the 9/11 truth movement. We are unstoppable. To deny the smidgeon of facts presented here and the many others unmentioned is akin to being like those who have denied the Holocaust. It's intellectually dishonest.

Go ahead and give this a thumbs down if your Patriotism is of the cheapest kind. Yours is the kind that our forefathers would have laughed at. They demanded that we question authority, as they did. Our Constitution provides us with the means to explore the truth and to keep the government in check. But even the Constitution has been threatened as of late.

So, give it a thumbs down if you wish to cling to your Cheap Patriotism and your unconditional loyalty to a President and a Government that has demonstrated nothing but contempt for Accountability, Truth, Constitution, and most importantly - the 9/11 victims, their families and surviving rescue workers who continue to suffer the loss of their loved ones.

Peace, may the truth be brought forward and the guilty be brought to justice.

Answer 2

An aircraft obviously hit the Pentagon. The debris from the plane that was recovered was considerably smaller than what would be expected to have resulted from a plane the size of the one alleged to have hit the Pentagon. The real carcass reportedly has never been found. I am not sure of the make and model of what was found. A missile also hit the Pentagon, because an aircraft that is used as a weapon of destruction is a missile. Is the Pentagon the new Bermuda Triangle, where planes seem to go missing but are never found, even in the form of debris?

Answer 3

do you even know the history of the building?

1) it is nearly 60 years old and was in the process of being upgraded because the last time that happened I was in diapers. believe it or not there are more important military buildings than the Pentagon.

2) it is anything but the "most heavily defended building in the world" considering at the time you could practically drive up to is and park not 50 yards away with out so much as a pass. remember we were not at war and the Pentagon of all things is an OFFICE BUILDING.

3) the vast majority of security cameras on property are internal not external. I have been there, there were not a lot of exterior facing cameras because every thing worth protecting is inside the building.

4) have you considered the possibility that the security office that would house the surveillance equipment was on the side of the building that was hit? all relevant info could have been lost. which would explain why there is little footage.

there are plenty or reasonable answers out there, But I take it your mind is made up and you have no use to logic and reason.

you must be a hit at the 9/11 conspiracy parties.

Answer 4

The Pentagon is not the most defended building in the world, or our country. That would be the White House. And how do you suggest stopping a plane/missile from crashing into a building. With our missile defense system that congress is so eager to fund?

And what makes you think you have the right to see the cameras in the Pentagon. You arn't even allowed into the Pentagon unless you work there, or have a personal escort.

Do you even know what NeoCon means?

Answer 5

Asking the wrong people if you want that info. You could just go visit Pentagon and look. They do tours you know. And it is not most heavily defended building in the world. I don't suppose you have proof for that do you? It's technically civilian building.

It's not like it's dug into mountains with SAM missiles around it. Pentagon have residential buildings around it.

It is not unusual for people to lock up evidences especially federal crimes. This ain't OJ drama here.

Answer 6

I live less than 20 miles from the Pentagon and that building is very easily accessible and totally visible from the highway that runs alongside it. BTW a former business consultant of ours lost both his parents on the plane that it the pentagon, tell him that the plane didn't hit the pentagon and that his parents are in hiding somewhere and in cahoots with the US government. Many people I know work at or around the Pentagon, some of them saw the plane from the highway as they were nearing work, another one helped pull people out of the building.

Answer 7

The pentagon is by far not the most defended building in the world. Do you see tanks outside it? Artillery? Hell, we can see pictures of it on Google Maps. How is it defended? It's a huge office building with some guns outside. That's about it.

Answer 8

Heavily defended? So there were a lot of security guards at the doors to make sure only people who had business there were allowed inside. Could you tell us how these guards were supposed to stop an airplane from flying into the building.

Answer 9

Security cameras around the Pentagon should all have their positions revealed to the general public. Let everyone know where they are! We have the right to know all these State Secrets and security measures.

You can trust us, can't you?

Silly.

Answer 10

yes, and of all places on this heavily defended building to be hit? but on the newly re-enforced wall!